Australians Cling to Covid overreach

The following article from Spectator Australia

A widely circulated Nine News article last week announced that ‘a new study finds fewer than 1 in 10 people thought lockdowns were “definitely too restrictive”.’

Summarising University of Tasmania research that unfortunately sits behind a paywall, the Nine News piece reports that a majority – or two-thirds – of Australians believe the severity and duration of Covid lockdowns were ‘just right’.

On closer inspection, the ‘fewer than 1 in 10’ teaser is somewhat misleading. Several paragraphs in, it becomes clear the study found that 8 per cent of respondents viewed Covid lockdowns as ‘definitely too restrictive’ and an additional 11 per cent believed they were ‘probably too restrictive’.

In other words, 1 in 5 Australians – or almost 5 million people if the study is accurate – took issue with excessive government intrusion on their lives over the last two years.

Given the small sample size of just 1,162 respondents, further research is needed to provide a fuller picture of Australian attitudes to our nation’s Covid response.

Even so, the finding that two-thirds of Aussies still today justify government lockdowns – even after the momentous damage they have wrought – remains baffling to many.

Indeed, some of the worst Premier-led abuses came months after Covid’s 98.8 per cent survival rate was confirmed. Medical professionals understood who was most vulnerable and how to protect them, in addition to the public having access to a swathe of effective early treatments.

Worse still, some Premiers further eroded public trust by keeping restrictions in place long after they achieved their envied jab targets.

The sunk-cost fallacy

Assuming the two-thirds statistic is accurate, there is a psychological explanation that may help shed light on Australians who still defend government overreach.

The sunk-cost fallacy describes people’s tendency to throw good money after bad in the belief that prior investments justify further expenditures. Put simply, the more you’ve spent on something, the less willing you are to let it go or admit that your spending was a mistake.

What is true in the realm of money also applies in relationships. Sadly, it is all too common for people to remain in failing relationships because they feel they’ve invested too much to leave.

In the case of harsh Covid lockdowns – and the sky-is-falling narrative long used to justify them – many Australians became so dug-in on the issue that it now feels impossible for them to abandon that position.

Sad stories abound of people ending relationships with friends and family members who challenged the mainstream narrative on lockdowns, masks, and vaccines. Many workplaces, schools, churches, and other institutions were so taken by Covid panic that they drove away some of their best people.

For such enthusiasts to now concede that the government took Covid restrictions too far would be to admit they made countless mistakes in their own lives and relationships. Far safer to continue believing the powers that be know best, even after all the suffering that was caused.

At least we’re not Shanghai

I have just returned from a six-week trip to the United States. I travelled through both red and blue states and spoke to people from across the political spectrum about Covid restrictions. And I noticed a curious phenomenon.

Those who were, in principle, supportive of government lockdowns and mandates tended to justify what they were subjected to personally, while viewing any restrictions that went further as too harsh.

When I explained how unhinged Australian governments were regarding Covid, liberal-leaning Americans were genuinely shocked. Nevertheless, they remained grateful for the restrictions they endured.

The same pattern can be observed in Australia. Covid enthusiasts here – as many as two-thirds of the country, apparently – still justify a horrific log of human rights abusesBut what the residents of Shanghai have suffered in recent months? What tyranny!

If we could speak to Shanghai’s captives about all things Covid, we would doubtless find many ‘simping’ for their communist overlords, but grateful they don’t have it as bad as North Korea.

The logic is laughable, yet still embraced by too many.

Covid mania has come and (now mostly) gone. But the psychological shift it has brought about in a majority of Australians will remain with us for years to come.

How it might be exploited for the next great apocalyptic fad is anyone’s guess.

Latest News


This post is a copy of last night’s mass email. It explains the ‘RDA lives’ comment and other things 🙂 If you’re not subscribed to

Read More »


  1. The whole agenda totally followed KGB brainwashing techniques…. create fear and panic then bombard with propaganda.

    The problem is that so many can quickly fall for it as a mob and they can only slowly and painfuly be brought out one by one.

    For many it seems like they are operating under the so called ,”Stockholme Syndrome”, where terrorists would hold hostages under gun point and forbid them from going to the toilet for long periods. After they were dirty and humiliated and dehumanised they would eventually be allowed to use the toilet and clean up…..and many would think that that was so nice of the terrorists. Some would even gain sympathy for the terrorists cause and some would fall in love with the terrorists.

    1. That’s the thing. A “survey ” can get any result it wants by selecting the right people or questions.

      The classic example is the “do you believe in global warming?” Sur eyors get radically different answers when they survey at 7am on a cold winter morning than when they survey at 1pm on a hot summer day.

  2. Covid-19 was the first worldwide tyrannic simulation to see if humanity could be controlled en mass since Nimrod, and humanity failed ! Tyranny won.
    Now the end is in sight, pity those who do not know God.

Thank you for supporting us!

Thank you for supporting the work that RDA does. You can support our work further by volunteering with us.