Call for a Royal Commission

In just the last week, we are seeing growing pressure on our Federal and State governments to release the evidence that supports the health advice which says we need to lockdown.  As of now, Victoria is into lockdown 6.0+, QLD has had its third lockdown and NSW is about nine weeks into a lockdown that has no end in sight. This has led to numerous high-level political figures to call for a Royal Commission into the government’s handling of the pandemic, and we will only see this drumbeat louder.  

When probed about what he thinks of a Royal Commission, Prime Minister Scott Morrison was evasive:

“I’m just focused on the response we need to make now,”

“I’m not going to be drawn into those things. There’ll be a time and a place to have those discussions – it’s not now.” (SBS 2021)1

A Royal Commission will have to uncover the scientific evidence that our health bureaucrats and politicians have relied upon so heavily to keep us locked down and that’s what Scott Morrison is worried about.  

So why would our Prime Minister be cold to the idea of a Royal Commission into the handling of the pandemic? Any organisation with an interest in becoming better always conducts post-activity reports, debriefs and the like.  They do this to work out what they did well and what they did poorly so they can improve processes and the like to ensure next time around they don’t make the same mistakes.  For some reason, in this instance, the focus seems to be on ignoring or subverting any critique on the governments’ actions throughout the pandemic.  Our Federal and State governments are fearful of what a Royal Commission will uncover.  Using its coercive powers to summon witness testimony under oath and summon documents, a Royal Commission will uncover the “health advice” that has destroyed our way of life without any substantive health benefit.  It will be shown that the evidence that supports the health advice is either non-existent or unproven.

It’s clear that there is a growing chorus of high-level politicians and scientists who are questioning the legitimacy of the “health advice” being touted by our leaders to support lockdowns.  One such figure is former Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott.  In an interview on 11th Aug 21 with The Institute of Public Affairs (IPA 2021)2, Tony Abbott clearly demonstrated a concern over the validity of the health advice by the fact that none has been presented from our government to the people that support such measures.  In his words “safety first is sometimes a dispiriting dictum” and suggested that we need to live our life to its fullest and hence get on with learning to live with the virus and not be locked down.  He also went so far as to support a Royal Commission to find out what we did right and what we did wrong.  But reading between the lines and knowing the powers of a Royal Commission we can see that this would uncover the real “health advice” which if our Federal and State governments had any faith, it would be more than happy to present to us. But instead, they’re waiting for us to pry it open through political and public willpower.  

Repeatedly, our Federal and State governments have ignored requests to release the evidence that supports the health advice to lockdown.  And that’s because it either doesn’t exist or it’s faulty.  

More and more scientists are coming out to the contrary providing evidence that demonstrates lockdowns either create more harm than good or that their effect is greatly overstated.  In one such instance Professor Karl Friston, a statistician ranked as the most influential in the world by Science Magazine, claims that government interventions, such as lockdowns, are not the defining factor in differentiating the impact that Covid has between countries.  Rather it can be traced more to biological markers such as natural T-cell levels between different populations (Freddie Sayers 2020)3

We are seeing more and more evidence to counter the effect of lockdowns in the public domain but we aren’t seeing any evidence come out of our governments to support the effectiveness of lockdowns over the generational damages that they are causing.

1 SBS 2021, Tony Abbott joins calls for royal commission into Australia’s coronavirus response, SBS News, viewed 6  September 2021 –

2 IPA 2021, Australia’s Heartland with Tony Abbott: The Future of The Australian Way of Life, Institute of Public Affairs, viewed 6 September 2021

3 Freddie Sayers 2020, Karl Friston: up to 80% not even susceptible to Covid-19, Karl Friston: up to 80% not even susceptible to Covid-19, UnHerd, viewed 6 September 2021 –



  1. Is there anyway that a nation-wide poll can be conducted asking Australians if they would vote to be controlled by the World Economic Forum’s Policies? Also, Can the Coalition be made to make public the contract that was signed by our Prime Minister between Australia and vaccine manufacturers such as Pfizer ( in particular) Astra Zeneca, and Moderna? Is this do-able under the Freedom of Information Act? I’m sure this would prove an eye opener.

  2. Bring on the Royal Commission but now, not in 6 or 12 months time.
    Victoria has been destroyed, how many more states have to go the
    same way before anything is done.

  3. Why are we afraid to call out exactly what is happening to our beautiful Australia? And why do we accept a Premiers dishonest comment, “the vaccines are not aimed at preventing a transmission, but to help lessen the risk of a person ending up with severe illness requiring hospitalisation or treatment in ICU after the transmission”, when we know full well it’s a bald face lie.

    Why don’t we question a Health Minister when he deliberately misleads, suggesting “the PCR testing is regarded as the current ‘Gold Standard’ for diagnosis of active COVID-19 infection”, when we know it doesn’t come close to matching Fools Gold. We know this is a lie, just like as know ‘the virus’ has never been isolated in a laboratory, even after extensive laboratory testing. Why do we sit back and not challenge?

    And how can a Health Minister stand steadfast with the TGA, when they suggest “all Covid-19 vaccines have been evaluated for safety and efficacy”, when we know the TGA didn’t even bother to check the manufacturers/suppliers data?

    And what about our State Police, all of whom have made a promise to protect their fellow citizens. Why haven’t they thrown their badges on the ground in disgust, and join in the protest with their fellow Australians? And why do they turn on a peaceful protest and spray the participants with Capsicum and Rubber Bullets? Why do they obey the orders of our Tyrant State Premiers? Do they not realise it is also their Australia to lose? And how can they not know that Morrison & Co will eventually come for them and their families too?

    And what is it with our Prime Minister who likes to play the good guy, and all else bad guy, when the buck really stops with him? Who is Scott Morrison, and why is he allowing the Deep State, and Globalist Cabal to take Australia down?

    WE DESPERATELY NEED A ROYAL COMMISSION, and in the meantime each and everyone of us should file our own actions with the courts, before we lose our jobs, our income, our dignity, our freedoms, and our beautiful Australia. Start now, and load up the Court system so it busts at the seams!

  4. COVID VACCINES – DIRE WARNINGS in this Paper by Seneff & Nigh – damage from these vaccines is potentially catastrophic and transgenerational – and now they have targets on our children.
    The rats will be scurrying from an exploding ship when the population learn the true facts of these shocking experimental covid vaccines – please read these papers – I note today, that already as at 16.9.2021 23,751,922 of these experimental jabs have been coerced/forced on Australians and being mandated for ever increasing population sectors – this grossly violating universal informed consent codes.
    Also Paper from Classen Immunotherapies.

    PLEASE READ THESE PAPERS AS OUR POLITICIANS are incapable of (allegedly) independent and unbiased research as their extreme pro-vaccination lobby involvement/stance proves and allegedly throughout the entire Australian Government Vaccinations Policy is rife with Conflicts of Interest -it’s shocking and they are answerable to no one. Likewise – who in the hell allowed mainstream media empires to be calling the shots and virtual mouthpieces for Pharmaceutical Industry (allegedly) – WRONG WRONG WRONG. They all have to be stopped. Read the Papers – the DIRE WARNINGS.


    Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible
    Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines
    Against COVID-19
    Stephanie Seneff and Greg Nigh
    Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge MA, 02139, USA, E-mail:
    [email protected]
    Naturopathic Oncology, Immersion Health, Portland, OR 97214, USA
    Operation Warp Speed brought to market in the United States two mRNA vaccines, produced by Pfizer and
    Moderna. Interim data suggested high efficacy for both of these vaccines, which helped legitimize Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA. However, the exceptionally rapid movement of these vaccines through controlled trials and into mass deployment raises multiple safety concerns. In this review we first describe the technology underlying these vaccines in detail. We then review both components of and the intended biological response to these vaccines, including production of the spike protein itself, and their potential relationship to a wide range of both acute and long-term induced pathologies, such as blood disorders, neurodegenerative diseases and autoimmune diseases. Among these potential induced pathologies, we discuss the relevance of prion-protein-related amino acid sequences within the spike protein. We also present a brief review of studies supporting the potential for spike protein “shedding”, transmission of the protein from a vaccinated to an unvaccinated person, resulting in symptoms induced in the latter. We finish by addressing a common point of debate, namely, whether or not these vaccines could modify the DNA of those receiving the vaccination. While there are no studies demonstrating definitively that this is happening, we provide a plausible scenario, supported by previously established pathways for transformation and transport of genetic material, whereby injected mRNA could ultimately be incorporated into germ cell DNA for transgenerational transmission. We conclude with our recommendations regarding surveillance that will help to clarify the long-term effects of these experimental drugs and allow us to better assess the true risk/benefit ratio of these novel technologies.
    Full Paper >

    COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease
    Classen Immunotherapies, Inc., 3637 Rockdale Road, Manchester
    MD 21102, E-mail: [email protected]
    J. Bart Classen, MD*
    Development of new vaccine technology has been plagued with problems in the past. The current RNA based SARSCoV-2 vaccines were approved in the US using an emergency order without extensive long term safety testing. In this paper the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated for the potential to induce prion-based disease in vaccine recipients. The RNA sequence of the vaccine as well as the spike protein target interaction were analyzed for the potential to convert intracellular RNA binding proteins TAR DNA binding protein (TDP-43) and Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) into their pathologic prion conformations. The results indicate that the vaccine RNA has specific sequences that may induce TDP-43 and FUS to fold into their pathologic prion confirmations. In the current analysis a total of sixteen UG tandem repeats (ΨGΨG) were identified and additional UG (ΨG) rich sequences were identified. Two GGΨA sequences were found. Potential G Quadruplex sequences are possibly present but a more sophisticated computer program is needed to verify these. Furthermore, the spike protein, created by the translation of the vaccine RNA, binds angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a zinc containing enzyme. This interaction has the potential to increase intracellular zinc. Zinc ions have been shown to cause the transformation of TDP-43 to its pathologic prion configuration.
    The folding of TDP-43 and FUS into their pathologic prion confirmations is known to cause ALS, front temporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological degenerative diseases.
    The enclosed finding as well as additional potential risks leads the author to believe that regulatory approval of the RNA based vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 was premature and that the vaccine may cause much more harm than benefit.
    Full Paper >

    Australia’s Democracy in the death throws – support/join Reignite Democracy and fight for your lives and freedoms and Medical Freedoms/Informed Consent ……..

  5. Vaccination and the Media – Conflicts of Interest in Australia
    30 June, 2020
    Around the world there’s a constant barrage of articles in the mainstream corporate media berating ‘anti-vaxxers’ and hindering citizens asking legitimate questions about vaccination policy.

    In Australia recently The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age have published a series of articles with an ‘anti-vaxxer’ theme – what is the motive behind the labelling and marginalisation of people who ask questions about vaccination? This is especially important to consider now as research on questionable coronavirus vaccines is being fast-tracked around the world.
    Conflicts of interest are clouding this issue.
    For an Australian perspective, see below independent vaccination campaigner Elizabeth Hart’s challenge to former politician Peter Costello.
    Costello is now Chairman of an Australian Government Investment Fund which includes over a billion dollars’ worth of vaccine company shares, while he also chairs a media company which publishes articles demeaning and marginalising people who question the ever-increasing number of lucrative vaccine products being added to the vaccination schedule.
    There’s a murky story to uncover about relationships between the media and vaccine industry…and connections with government.
    We the people have to work on exposing this scandal ourselves…
    16 June 2020
    For the attention of:
    Mr Peter Costello
    Chairman of the Board of Guardians of the Future Fund
    Non-Executive Chairman of Nine Entertainment Co
    Dear Mr Costello,
    It appears you have alarming conflicts of interest in your roles as Independent Non-Executive Chairman of Nine Entertainment Co, and Chairman of the Board of Guardians of the Future Fund.

    Nine Entertainment Co’s media promotes biased articles on vaccination, which ignore citizens’ valid concerns about vaccination policy and the burgeoning number of vaccine products being added to schedules without consultation, while the Future Fund has over a billion dollars invested in companies which inter alia manufacture lucrative vaccine products, i.e. CSL, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, and Merck.

    Consider below recent articles published in The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and other publications, which are generally couched as attacks on ‘anti-vaxxers’, and fail to provide critical analysis of complicated matters relevant to taxpayer-funded vaccination policy, i.e.

    ‘Dangerous’: Researchers note ‘massive uptick’ in anti-vaccination activity. Wendy Tuohy, 14 June 2020
    Government must counter misinformation on vaccinations. The Herald’s View, 14 June 2020
    Experts warn of new strains of misinformation as COVID-19 seeds conspiracy theories. Tim Biggs, 8 June 2020
    ‘Slap them down’ or hear them out: How to handle misinformation ‘superspreaders’? Wendy Tuohy, 31 May 2020
    ‘Act now’: AMA urges health education to combat ‘growing’ anti-vaxxer movement. Max Koslowski, 25 May 2020
    Federal ministers flooded with unprecedented level of anti-vaccination mail. Max Koslowski, 24 May 2020
    Queensland bans NRL players who refuse flu jab on non-medical grounds. Laine Clark and Scott Bailey, 12 May 2020
    Flu-jab duo face potential pay freeze as NRL, Titans brace for courtroom showdown. Michael Chammas and Sarah Keoghan, 11 May 2020
    Anti-vaccination activists use coronavirus to push resistance to inoculation. Peter Jamison, 6 May 2020
    Vaccination-sceptic political party wins name change despite heavyweight objectors. Zach Hope, 2 May 2020
    ‘Anti-vaxxers stay home’: Health Minister issues warning, announces new flu vaccine program for all primary school children. Lauren Pilat, 27 April 2020
    ‘Absolutely insane’: Anti-vaxxers promote coronavirus conspiracies. Caitlin Fitzsimmons and Tom Rabe, 20 April 2020
    Meanwhile, CSL/Seqirus receives product promotion and endorsement courtesy of The Sydney Morning Herald, i.e.

    ‘There will be enough’: CSL to hit record flu vaccine production. (Emma Koehn, 19 April 2020.)
    Did CSL/Seqirus pay for this flu vaccine product promotion in The Sydney Morning Herald?

    Mr Costello, the Future Fund has invested over a billion dollars in companies which inter alia manufacture vaccine products – it appears you have a conflict of interest in also being Chairman of a corporate media group which discredits and marginalises citizens who question taxpayer-funded vaccination policy, reflexively labelling them as ‘anti-vaccination’. CSL shares valued at $674 million, plus Pfizer shares worth more than $265 million, $251 million of Johnson and Johnson shares, and over $134 million of shares in Merck were equity holdings of the Future Fund Board of Guardians as of 30 June 2019.

    $310 million worth of Facebook shares are also listed in the Future Fund portfolio, and it is notable that Facebook is now hindering citizens’ free discussion of matters relevant to vaccine products and policy with its self-appointed ‘fact-checkers’.

    Mr Costello, many groups around the world are now working on fast-tracking coronavirus vaccine products, being led by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and with taxpayer-funding from many governments, including at least $352 million from the Australian government.
    Please note more discerning citizens will be demanding transparency and accountability for the lucrative vaccine products being pressed upon the global community.
    Corporate media groups such as Nine Entertainment Co will also be held accountable for biased reporting which provides unquestioning promotion for vaccine products.

    In Australia, News Corp also promotes biased coverage of vaccination matters, without disclosing its own conflict of interest in being a corporate partner of the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, an organisation which is involved in vaccine product research and development.
    Rupert Murdoch’s mother Dame Elisabeth Murdoch was involved in the establishment of the original Murdoch Institute, and today Sarah Murdoch is a member of the Board and the Ambassador for the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute.
    News Corp tabloids were behind the No Jab, No Play media campaign, which was obligingly adopted as policy by politicians across the political spectrum in Australia, and enacted as the coercive No Jab, No Pay law under Malcolm Turnbull as Prime Minister in January 2016. Members of the coercive vaccination lobby groups SAVN and Friends of Science in Medicine, e.g. John Cunningham and David Hawkes, were influential at the Senate Committee hearing re the No Jab, No Pay Bill in November 2015, which was attended by SAVN supporter Senator Richard Di Natale.

    Mr Costello, biased corporate media groups in Australia have failed to provide critical analysis of taxpayer-funded vaccination policy, an area which is awash with conflicts of interest, a situation that has been allowed to fester under both Liberal/Coalition and Labor governments, including during your tenure as a Liberal Member of Parliament. Likewise the taxpayer-funded ABC and SBS have failed to provide critical analysis of vaccination policy, simply acting as unquestioning promoters of vaccine products via their news articles and broadcasts.

    I have recently written to Prime Minister Scott Morrison requesting transparency for the various committees and organisations influencing vaccination policy, e.g. the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation; the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee; the National Centre for Immunisation Research & Surveillance; the TGA’s Advisory Committee on Vaccines; the TGA’s Australian Influenza Vaccine Committee; the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute; the Telethon Kids Institute; the Working Group and Oversight Committee for the Australian Academy of Science publication The Science of Immunisation: Questions and Answers; and any other group or organisation influential on Australian vaccination policy.

    It’s also notable that members of the industry-funded Immunisation Coalition are very influential in the media and on policy, but seldom disclose that this organisation is funded by vaccine manufacturers Seqirus/CSL, Pfizer, Merck (MSD), GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi. The Immunisation Coalition is also associated with the Australian Medical Association, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and other medical organisations, and is also sponsored by Google and others. Dr Tony Bartone, the current President of the Australian Medical Association, is an Immunisation Coalition member, a fact which is seldom disclosed in media articles. Other members of the Immunisation Coalition who are frequently provided with a soapbox in the media include Professor Robert Booy, Associate Professor Margie Danchin, Dr Katie Attwell and current Chair Dr Rod Pearce, but they seldom disclose they are associated with a vaccine industry-funded organisation.

    I have repeatedly brought many matters of concern about vaccination policy to the attention of journalists in Australia, including at The Sydney Morning Herald, and the taxpayer-funded ABC, but there appears to be a determination to ignore conflicts of interest in vaccination policy, and emerging problems with vaccine products.

    Mr Costello, please be aware of your conflicts of interest via the Future Fund, and in your position as Chairman of Nine Entertainment Co, and ensure that its media interests fulfil the ideal of the fourth estate and provide balanced and considered analysis of matters relevant to national and international vaccination policy.

    I request your response on this matter.

    Elizabeth Hart
    Independent citizen investigating conflicts of interest in vaccination policy and the over-use of vaccine products

    Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.

    Republishing Guidelines
    Source >

Related Stories

Thank you for supporting us!

Thank you for supporting the work that RDA does. You can support our work further by volunteering with us.