Daniel Andrews’ ‘mandate’ is at odds with Scott Morrison and the position of the Federal Government


Very urgent information for Victorian Employers. 

Daniel Andrews’ ‘mandate’ is at odds with Scott Morrison and the position of the Federal Government. 

Share everywhere.



Latest News


This post is a copy of last night’s mass email. It explains the ‘RDA lives’ comment and other things 🙂 If you’re not subscribed to

Read More »


  1. The bosses don’t care – they will also be under a legal requirement (from dan) to collect all vax details of their employees and/or keep unvaxed people off their work site or face HUGE fines.. Scott Morriscum is doing nothing and not standing up for Australians … if we take the jabs we’re ****ed… if we don’t we don’t have a jab and we’re ****ed … Im tired, I’m stressed and I’m sick and tired.. may as well lay down 🙁

    1. I agree with everything you say, and when it comes closer
      to home, it is even worse. Yesterday my daughter was told that
      she had to get the jab, but she said NO. She was so stressed
      out when she came home. She took the day off today because
      of stress, but another employee also said NO and told the boss
      that he could be sued. All of Andrews “rules” might be mandatory
      but they are not law.

    2. Please don;t lay down. fight for you rights, if we stand together and stand STRONG we will beat the evil that’s happening in our country and the world. GOD BLESS

  2. It’s not just at odds with the Federal Gov, it’s COMPLETELY ILLEGAL. It breaches our Constitutional Law under the Constitutional Guarantee Sect 51, 23A, which in summary states that NO FORM OF ANY MEDICAL PROCEDURE CAN BE FORCED UPON YOU WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT OR AGAINST YOUR WILL. This has been upheld by the High Court of Australia, many times since it was included in our Constitution in 1946, by Public Referendum.
    Last week, on 27 September, 2021, the Fair Work Commission handed down its DECISION, Case No C2021/2676, and it found that Covid vaccination CANNOT be mandated by employees on health and safety grounds. I have summarised here because the ‘Decision’ is 50 pages long, and it refers to a number of international conventions that Australia has signed into, including the Nuremburg Code, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Declaration of Helsinki, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to name a few. This is an extensive review and decision by the Fair Work Commission.
    It is just illegal to force, coerce or demand that an Australian Citizen must succombe to any medical procedure, and this includes vaccinations. As the vaccines here in Australia have not been fully tested they are only provisionally approved for use in Australia and as such are a clinical trial. Consent is required in Australia for all participation in clinical trials. For more information, including a copy of the Fair Work Commission’s decision, contact me.

    1. Is it correct that the Victorian State of Emergency (SOE) powers end on 15th Dec,2021, and unless Daniels calls the Parliament by 15th Oct., gets another SOE granted, his SOE powers fall away on 15th Dec?
      If so, would Andrews be too scared to a call for Parliament, since he has not needed / had them for nearly 2 years?

    2. Having listened to the live telecast for 4 days on the Kassam; Henry v Hazzard; Naumenko case, the Constitution argument does not seem to be quiet that tight as I would like it to be based on the cross examinations on this hearing. Again, this is just from a lay person perspective as I have no legal background to determine the strength on this argument.

  3. Hi Monica,

    I wonder if you can help me to understand the mandatory vaccination demanded by the Victorian Government. Their power is based on the Directions from Acting Chief Health Officer in accordance with emergency powers arising from declared state of emergency. COVID-19 Mandatory Vaccination Directions (No 5) as shown on the link below.
    On this directive, it clearly states Under Section 1 (2) and (3), that this directive was targeted to those “Authorised Workers” working in following sector of our industry.
    a) residential aged care facilities; and
    b) construction sites.
    c) healthcare facilities; and
    d) education facilities.
    However, in Dan Andrews’ Media Release dated 1st Oct 21, it states, “On the advice of our public health team, all workers – in Melbourne and regional Victoria – on the Authorised Worker list will require their first COVID-19 vaccine dose by Friday, 15 October in order to continue working onsite.” My understanding is that the use of the “Authorised Worker list” is misleading as this term is much broader than stipulated under the authority stipulated under the Directions from Acting Chief Health Officer in accordance with emergency powers arising from declared state of emergency. COVID-19 Mandatory Vaccination Directions (No 5). For example, religious leaders are considered as “Authorised Worker” but they are not stipulated to have the mandatory vaccination under COVID-19 Mandatory Vaccination Directions (No 5).
    Moreover, according to this website, https://www.coronavirus.vic.gov.au/information-workers-required-be-vaccinated, it also mentioned that “Authorised Providers and Authorised Workers” are required to be vaccinated too. So, my question is under what power or authority are these group of people are required to have mandatory vaccination when they are not mentioned under the COVID-19 Mandatory Vaccination Directions (No 5). I look forward to your clarification.

  4. I will do everything in my power to not have the vaccine. I told my boss from the very start about how I felt. Dan Andrews has made a rule which is definitely not legal. It is important for people to stand firm and say no if they do not wish to have the vaccine and further more to remind them this is not law. It impinges on our human rights and contravenes our constitution. If a boss chooses to fire you remind them that you can take legal action. It may take anything up to six months but you will sue him/her! There is no way in the world that in a democracy a Government has the right to tell you who you can and cannot hire or fire! They too could have a case for suing the Government.