EMAIL John Skerritt (HEAD OF TGA)…we’ve made it easy for you

Over the last few months, a group of doctors and scholars have been unsuccessful in getting answers from John. They reached out to RDA to raise awareness. They have grave concerns for our health and safety in this country.

Here’s an email template for you. COPY and PASTE this and press the button below to email him directly. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gtwHSNeAO9UOSxfFvsomSSOpz8LHWMEv/edit

Hi John,

Hope you are well. I am writing to you to gain some understanding as to why the TGA will not approve or organise to have approved the use of Hydroxychloroquine and or Ivermectin as part of treatment for COVID-19? There are plenty of worldwide studies that promote the inclusion of these 2 drugs, especially in the early stages when someone is infected with COVID-19 and also to help prevent infection in the first place.

There is even a peer-reviewed early treatment guide that specifically mentions the use of these medications as part of the treatments – https://aapsonline.org/covidpatientguide

Both drugs have been around for a while now, properly tested on humans, readily available and relatively cheap but at this stage are not recommended by the TGA for use in treating COVID-19 ; I even understand the TGA has made a decision to actually prevent Doctors from using Hydroxychloroquine. In contrast, the TGA has approved and encouraged the use of COVID-19 vaccines which have not been tested for medium to long term side effects and in the case of MRNA vaccine such as Pfizer uses brand new technology which has never previously been used on humans before. Furthermore, the Federal Government has granted companies like Pfizer immunity from liability if something unintentionally goes wrong with their vaccines.  

I find it very hard to understand how Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin have not been approved for use to treat COVD-19 but these brand new vaccines – still in testing phases – have been.

Can you please explain why the vaccines have been approved for use but  Hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin have not?

From an outsider looking in it seems there is more money to be made from the vaccines as opposed to Hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin. Furthermore, I find it disturbing that companies such as Pfizer cannot stand by their product and are given immunity from liability if something goes wrong.

As you are the head of the TGA then the buck officially stops with you!

If I do take the short term tested vaccine, without being given the option of taking other drugs with longer safety records such as  Hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin then I will be holding you personally responsible if something does go wrong that would not have gone wrong had I been given these longer safety data options.

I would really appreciate you responding to this email.

Kind Regards,

First Name Last Name

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Share on telegram
Telegram
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on email
Email

Related Stories

Responses

  1. I think that form of treatment was banned from use from some country because political hatred has marred their judgment!

    I think it because it was because President Trump promoted that treatment in the USA and because of him they banned as many people hate Trump, can’t understand why.

    What more it is criminal what they have done as all the current vaccine companies seems have a very dark past!

  2. Hi Monica and others,
    I uploaded MY email to John Skerritt and I also uploaded HIS REPLY with an intend that the appropriate groups/organisations/companies that are interested to have Ivermectin and Hydrozychloriquine can be applied for to be approved by TGA. Without there being NO ONE to apply for any drugs to be applied for inclusion by the TGA, nothing can be done by the TGA. Call it catch 22, but the TGA needs first that someone, ie. groups/companies, etc. MUST first apply for inclusion of a drug. I hope that helps.