It is becoming increasingly obvious that the vaccines being forced on many Australians, and billions around the world, are not safe. A moment’s reflection would have indicated that the authorities were always lying when they said they knew they were “safe”. These vaccines had been developed in only a few months and yet safety is something that takes years to establish – typically 8-10 years. It is only possible to know the medium and long term effects of a medical product if you wait for the medium and long term to actually occur!
Increasingly evident now is that the vaccines are not even safe in the short term. Some are even speculating that there is a ‘depopulation agenda’ behind forcing people to get jabbed, a claim that is difficult to support and which does not make much financial sense given that reductions in population also mean collapsing economies. A more logical reason could be to reduce life expectancy, which would make more financial sense. We will consider that later.
First, let us consider the accumulating, publicly collected, evidence that the vaccines are dangerous. The WHO’s Vigiaccess site lists over 2 million adverse events, and thousands of types of adverse events. Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) is reporting 78,000 adverse events. In the United States, the death toll from the vaccines is three times the entire death toll from vaccines over the previous 35 years.
These indicators alone, and there are many more of them, point to a lack of safe outcomes in less than a year. So what will happen over five or 10 years? The assurances from the authorities now look like what they always were – a deliberate deception designed to trick people into thinking they were removing ‘risk’ by getting the shot.
For those at very low risk of contracting Covid-19 (which is pretty much everybody below 60 who is in good health), the opposite has happened.
Mortality statistics in heavily vaccinated populations are troubling, although again there may be confounding factors. Based on weekly data from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) in the UK, vaccinated people under 60 are twice as likely to die as unvaccinated people. Overall number of deaths in Britain are far above normal. In Germany and Sweden, for people weeks after receiving their second Covid jab,
death rates are 20 per cent or more above normal.
This is some of the aggregate statistical data, which is disturbing enough, although it should always be acknowledged that it can be distorted by confounding influences. Biological evidence is also emerging about how the vaccines can harm the body. Here’s a few examples:
A Swedish study found that[i] “the spike protein localizes in the nucleus and inhibits DNA damage repair … [which] might impede adaptive immunity.” The study also speculates that it may increase the likelihood of cancer.
According to pathologist Ryan N Cole[ii] there are laboratory indications that the vaccines reduce the number of “critically important T-cells you need… in your innate immune system.” He says this is leading to an uptick of herpes family viruses, shingles, mono and human papilloma virus. “We are literally weakening the immune systems of these individuals.”
Virologist Dr Bryam Bridle says[iii] ” there is a disturbingly high rate of people whose cancer was in remission who have seen it come back after getting vaccinated “.
Viral immunologist, Dr Jessica Rose, claims [iv] that the vaccines are “immuno-modulating the immune system and causing hyper inflammation”, plus negatively affecting the so called ‘killer T-cells’, which, if depleted “is very bad news, because we don’t have a population of cells in the acquired immune system to remove virally-infected cells.”
There are indications of the jabs causing Vaccine Immune Deficiency Syndrome, which reduces protection not just against Covid, but also other diseases. Another doctor[v] tested the immune system of a patient after his two jabs and found the effect on his system was comparable to HIV.
Dr David LV Bauer of the Francis Crick Institute says[vi] “Recipients of two doses of the Pfizer vaccine have five to six-fold lower level of neutralizing antibodies in the immune system, which block the virus from getting into cells”.
This is perhaps why Covid infections now appear to be more of a problem for the vaccinated than the unvaccinated.
A US cruise ship, for example, had an outbreak of Covid despite all the passengers being fully vaccinated.
A Pfizer whistle blower[vii] has claimed that Pfizer is aware that the shots can cause those vaccinated to be more prone to contracting COVID-19 and infections. “When they weren’t injected, their infection rate was 1.3% and when they got injected, it was 4.34%. It went up by over 300%,” she told a public meeting. “They had less infection when they had no protection. So, that’s a problem.”
The potential dangers of heart disease, myocarditis and pericarditis, blood clots, bleeding, heart attacks, strokes, vascular and neurological diseases are being more publicly acknowledged, but not the next logical step. The next logical step would be to halt or reassess the jabbing of children.
The children are at zero risk from Covid, so in light of all the aforementioned findings, if we continue intending to jab children, that then amounts to deliberate homicide. Any deaths and injuries that occur with children as a result of vaccines are unambiguously unnecessary and constitute wilful harm.
Most of the evidence that the mRNA inoculations are not safe – they are not conventional vaccines but rather untried gene therapies – is not being collected systematically, as would normally be the case. Why? Because neither the authorities nor the pharmaceutical companies are observing their usual practices. The FDA outrageously has asked for the data on the Pfizer vaccine trials to be released over a 75-year period[viii]. Nothing at all suspicious about that!
Robert Malone, the virologist, and one of the inventors of mRNA, has observed that long standing practices that he had taken for granted with drug approvals have been thrown away. The so called ‘precautionary principle’: first do no harm, has simply not been applied, especially with the calls to jab children.
Worse, because legislators in democratic countries have ducked their responsibility, by instead handing the rule making over to bureaucrats, there is unlikely to be any accountability. You can bet ‘health authorities’ will not stick around to take the blame. Rather, those pushing the jabs will double down, as we are seeing in Australia with the recent push to get boosters because of the Omicron variant, which appears to be far more benign.
The fact that boosters are deemed necessary indicates that the protection of the vaccines has a very short duration. But logic, it seems, no longer matters, just the imposition of medical edicts from public servants.
The relationship between the Legislature and Executive has been reversed. The Executive is called that because it is supposed to execute laws, not make them. But that seems to no longer apply.
So, what might be the deeper motivation?
One is obviously the financial incentives for pharmaceutical companies, which, as Robert F Kennedy has extensively documented[ix], has corrupted America’s, and therefore the world’s, systems of health regulation. It is “regulatory capture on steroids”, as Kennedy memorably describes it.
Other commentators are saying there is a depopulation agenda pushed by those who want to establish a New World Order. This is harder to examine. Nobody is ever going to admit that this is their motive, even if it is the case. It is also hard to see any financial sense in it, given it would mean economic implosion.
But what might make more sense is reducing the life expectancy of the developed world’s population. Because developed economies are ageing, pensions are becoming an ever-increasing burden on public finances (although not in Australia where the system is constructed to make itself self-funding). In Europe and North America there are huge looming problems with unfunded pension liabilities. How financially convenient it would be if people died younger.