NSW Teachers – you have options

1. “I might have had it, I might not have. The Privacy Act indicates I don’t have to share it with you.

2. “I’ve booked my appointment for the first jab” (book it in as far away as possible)

3. Use our ‘Informed Consent’ pack. It gives instructions on how to prove your attempt at giving informed consent. https://www.reignitedemocracyaustralia.com.au/informed-consent/

Latest News


This post is a copy of last night’s mass email. It explains the ‘RDA lives’ comment and other things 🙂 If you’re not subscribed to

Read More »


  1. 1. There is no legal authority that can require you to get a vaccine against your will.

    2. If you don’t get a vaccine, you cannot be coerced into wearing a mask, getting tested, or being excluded from your school or place of employment.

    3. The law is on your side. You have the right to be accommodated for your medical condition or religious beliefs.

    4. You have to educate your boss or school about the law. (We can help you do that.)

    5. Your employer/school will try to confuse, coerce, intimidate, threaten and harass you.
    This is called retaliation and discrimination, and that is against the law.

    6. You have the right to determine what is done with your body.

    7. It doesn’t matter whether the vaccine only has an “emergency authorization” or not.

    8. Even if the vaccine becomes approved, you cannot be forced to take one.

    9. You can seek an exemption for the vaccine, the mask and the testing. We recommend a religious exemption, which also includes your sincerely-held ethical and moral beliefs.

    10. The masks and the testing are also “emergency use authorization” but even if they weren’t, you cannot be forced into complying.

    11. Only a licensed medical doctor can prescribe a medical treatment such as a mask, covid testing or a vaccine. Your boss or school administrator has no authority to do so.

    12. No CDC guidelines, OSHA regulations or health officer order can suspend your rights.

    13. You have the constitutionally-protected and GUARANTEED right to life and the right to determine what it done to your body.

    14. You do not have to tell your boss or school administrator whether or not you got vaccinated. That is your private information. You cannot be discriminated against for not disclosing that information.

    15. IMPORTANT!! Do NOT sign any paper that says you will disclose your medical information and do NOT agree to wearing a mask or testing.

    16. You do not have to defend yourself against their requests. Instead: turn the tables and demand that they tell you their LEGAL AUTHORITY to require you to participate in these medical interventions.

    17. IMPORTANT!!! Don’t focus on the science (or lack thereof). It actually weakens your position. IT DOESN’T MATTER IF THE MASKS, TESTING OR VACCINES WORK OR NOT. WHAT MATTERS IS YOU DO NOT HAVE TO CONSENT IF YOU DON’T WANT TO.

    18. It is UNLAWFUL for your employer/school to assume you are a threat to the health and safety of others, without proof from a licensed medical doctor or an order from the court.

    19. Only a COURT ORDER can compel you to cover your face, get a covid test or get vaccinated. And even then – you can appeal the court’s decision.

    20. And if you DID have a contagious disease – now you would be covered under ADA laws and your needs would have to be accommodated by law.

    21. Federal law requires your employer/school to accommodate your religious beliefs – or sincerely-held ethical or moral beliefs – without discrimination.

    22. Your employer/school may delay, deny or deliberately try to make it so difficult for you so that you give in, give up or give over your sovereign authority and God-given RIGHT to determine what it done to your body. DON’T FALL FOR IT! We can tell you what to do.

    23. Your employer/school may tell you that they are: following OSHA regulations; following the CDC; or following their own policies. Demand that they produce the statutory law that gives them the authority to violate your rights.

    24. Your employer/school will tell you that accommodating you creates a “hardship” and therefore they don’t have to accommodate you. The LAW states that the school or employer has to PROVE that the hardship is more than just minimal. Are you asking for your own private classroom, tutor, office, air filtration, personal trainer, personal chef, 24/7 medical care and chauffeur? If not, then there is NO HARDSHIP.

    25. Remember: YOU do not have to prove anything.

    NOTE: This information comes from an American. This does not mean it’s not applicable in Common Law countries, like Australia is supposed to be. However, it may need some minor adjusting. At the end of the day, who owns your body? You or the Government? You or the Police? You or your employer? You or the Supermarket?

    1. HI, i have just heard today that our employer has put up a page on the notice board about who is vaccinated and who isn’t – then wants to know WHY if you are not…
      I have not seen this document yet but i have asked a colleague to take a picture of it Monday (if he remembers) and send it to me as i work in an out lying depot – i am in public Transport
      WTF is going on?

      1. @andrew

        I have created a method to fight anyone attempting to coerce people into taking the jab. You are welcome to share this or include this on your website.


        feel free to contact me if you need help in understanding the process my email thesimonshields@gmail.com I am also on Serene Teffaha forum i suggest you join her forum as well here https://www.advocateme.com.au

      2. @andrew
        If your employer has really been stupid enough to do this, it probably constitutes a notifiable data breach. i.e. sensitive personal information has been disclosed without consent. Tell them it’s a data breach. If they don’t report it themselves there are heavy penalties. (Notifiable Date Breaches must be reported). Also, report it to OAIC yourself. I’m not a lawyer but am familiar with the rules around data breaches due to my work.

    2. @therevolutileni you’re absolutely right. There are ways to obtain a legal agreement between two parties that is not seen as belligerent. It uses biblical principles and is an equity law process using a notice of conditional acceptance, notice of fault and opportunity to cure and a notice of default.


      I have personally used this method to obtain summary judgement without needing to go to court to beat speeding fines and other victimless petty infringements where the claimant have no proof of claim.

    3. Great points!

      There is one other point people keep raising: don’t quit – get fired instead. Your legal position is much stronger that way, apparently. I may have missed it above, it’s early, or late, depending.

    1. Hi Missmoons I just sent you a PM on telegram. The trouble with telegram is that searching for contacts is a bit fiddly and not very intuitive. And one needs to be in your contacts I think to see your channel. Cheers, P

  2. COVID VACCINES – DIRE WARNINGS in this Paper by Seneff & Nigh – damage from these vaccines is potentially catastrophic and transgenerational – and now they have targets on our children.
    The rats will be scurrying from an exploding ship when the population learn the true facts of these shocking experimental covid vaccines – please read these papers – I note today, that already as at 16.9.2021 23,751,922 of these experimental jabs have been coerced/forced on Australians and being mandated for ever increasing population sectors – this grossly violating universal informed consent codes.
    Also Paper from Classen Immunotherapies.

    PLEASE READ THESE PAPERS AS OUR POLITICIANS are incapable of (allegedly) independent and unbiased research as their extreme pro-vaccination lobby involvement/stance proves and allegedly throughout the entire Australian Government Vaccinations Policy is rife with Conflicts of Interest -it’s shocking and they are answerable to no one. Likewise – who in the hell allowed mainstream media empires to be calling the shots and virtual mouthpieces for Pharmaceutical Industry (allegedly) – WRONG WRONG WRONG. They all have to be stopped. Read the Papers – the DIRE WARNINGS.


    Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible
    Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines
    Against COVID-19
    Stephanie Seneff and Greg Nigh
    Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge MA, 02139, USA, E-mail:
    Naturopathic Oncology, Immersion Health, Portland, OR 97214, USA
    Operation Warp Speed brought to market in the United States two mRNA vaccines, produced by Pfizer and
    Moderna. Interim data suggested high efficacy for both of these vaccines, which helped legitimize Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA. However, the exceptionally rapid movement of these vaccines through controlled trials and into mass deployment raises multiple safety concerns. In this review we first describe the technology underlying these vaccines in detail. We then review both components of and the intended biological response to these vaccines, including production of the spike protein itself, and their potential relationship to a wide range of both acute and long-term induced pathologies, such as blood disorders, neurodegenerative diseases and autoimmune diseases. Among these potential induced pathologies, we discuss the relevance of prion-protein-related amino acid sequences within the spike protein. We also present a brief review of studies supporting the potential for spike protein “shedding”, transmission of the protein from a vaccinated to an unvaccinated person, resulting in symptoms induced in the latter. We finish by addressing a common point of debate, namely, whether or not these vaccines could modify the DNA of those receiving the vaccination. While there are no studies demonstrating definitively that this is happening, we provide a plausible scenario, supported by previously established pathways for transformation and transport of genetic material, whereby injected mRNA could ultimately be incorporated into germ cell DNA for transgenerational transmission. We conclude with our recommendations regarding surveillance that will help to clarify the long-term effects of these experimental drugs and allow us to better assess the true risk/benefit ratio of these novel technologies.
    Full Paper >

    COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease
    Classen Immunotherapies, Inc., 3637 Rockdale Road, Manchester
    MD 21102, E-mail: classen@vaccines.net
    J. Bart Classen, MD*
    Development of new vaccine technology has been plagued with problems in the past. The current RNA based SARSCoV-2 vaccines were approved in the US using an emergency order without extensive long term safety testing. In this paper the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated for the potential to induce prion-based disease in vaccine recipients. The RNA sequence of the vaccine as well as the spike protein target interaction were analyzed for the potential to convert intracellular RNA binding proteins TAR DNA binding protein (TDP-43) and Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) into their pathologic prion conformations. The results indicate that the vaccine RNA has specific sequences that may induce TDP-43 and FUS to fold into their pathologic prion confirmations. In the current analysis a total of sixteen UG tandem repeats (ΨGΨG) were identified and additional UG (ΨG) rich sequences were identified. Two GGΨA sequences were found. Potential G Quadruplex sequences are possibly present but a more sophisticated computer program is needed to verify these. Furthermore, the spike protein, created by the translation of the vaccine RNA, binds angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a zinc containing enzyme. This interaction has the potential to increase intracellular zinc. Zinc ions have been shown to cause the transformation of TDP-43 to its pathologic prion configuration.
    The folding of TDP-43 and FUS into their pathologic prion confirmations is known to cause ALS, front temporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological degenerative diseases.
    The enclosed finding as well as additional potential risks leads the author to believe that regulatory approval of the RNA based vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 was premature and that the vaccine may cause much more harm than benefit.
    Full Paper >