Media reports indicate that more than 200 people were arrested and six police officers were hospitalised during a protest in Melbourne on Saturday.

Protest organisers had rallied 10,000 people together at noon on Saturday in Melbourne to make a peaceful public declaration of disagreement with state government restrictions on businesses, education, healthcare, and mental health.  

Music, signs, and banners demonstrated the ways people had been personally affected; and their personal views on the ways the Andrews government has been managing Victoria during the covid-19 pandemic.

A protest spokesperson said the throngs of people walking various Melbourne CBD streets was encouraging and inspiring as they made their way toward Parliament House on Spring Street.  Many people, faces bare and free of masks, introduced themselves as they walked along and shared heartbreaking stories of how the government lockdowns have impacted their lives.  

It was up until this point, that the protest was a peaceful and family-friendly event.  

As the crowds approached Parliament House, they were met with multiple barricade lines of Public Order Response Team police members to prevent people from arriving.  Protesters stood several meters from the police line, cautious and fearful of such a heavy police response.  

One protest attendee described the following scene as ‘horrific, I’ve never seen such an instant and brutal reaction by police’ as the PORT began firing rubber bullets, OC spray and extendable batons at the crowd in an unprovoked opening attack.  One of the victims, a ten-year-old boy attending the protest with his father, was seen crying, and screaming from the painful effects of the OC spray.  Another victim was seen lying on the ground in agony after being shot in the face with a rubber bullet.  The public were left questioning why police would instigate such a hostile act on a peaceful crowd; and so in fear, protestors ran from Spring Street.  

It became clear to protest members that the police were tactically pushing the crowds to a predetermined location.  One attendee said they could see lines of police strategically barricading alleyways and smaller streets in an effort to direct the crowds to Flinders Street for isolation and crowd control.   <Attached image PORT barricade>

Police barricades continued to push the crowds toward Flinders Street, dividing the larger protest group into smaller crowds of people for easier management by law enforcers.  Media reports describe the scene at Flinders Street as violent and disturbing; what they fail to report is the provocative and violence-instigating behaviour demonstrated by Victoria Police in the lead up to arriving at Flinders Street.  One senior PORT officer was recorded inciting members of the protest and yelling “Here we go boys!” to his team members, and “Come on p#ssies! Here we go!” at the crowd after ordering an officer to ready himself with a rubber pellet gun pointed at the protesters.  <Attached video PORT Officer provocation>

After being chased by police for over 1200 metres the crowds arriving at Flinders Street Station were fearful and alarmed by the intentionally hostile approach police had taken.  

For many, the scenes at Flinders Street station will never be forgotten.  It is apparent that some members of the public were overcome with anger and fear, and reacted to the police violence with excessive behaviour resulting in arrest.  One protest attendee described a scene as absolutely extreme.  ‘We watched as four police officers grabbed a guy as he was retreating, they tackled him to the ground and then another officer ran up to them with a baton in hand and took a strong swing at the guy’s head.’

‘It was time to leave.  It was too much.  I’ve never seen anything like it.  I’ve heard reports of police brutality during these protests, but I wasn’t prepared for that.’

One protest spokesperson said, ‘despite what the media are reporting, the protest began as peaceful, but the police turned it into a violent situation.’ 

-Author Anonymous

Related Stories

Responses

  1. COVID VACCINES – DIRE WARNINGS in this Paper by Seneff & Nigh – damage from these vaccines is potentially catastrophic and transgenerational – and now they have targets on our children.
    The rats will be scurrying from an exploding ship when the population learn the true facts of these shocking experimental covid vaccines – please read these papers – I note today, that already as at 16.9.2021 23,751,922 of these experimental jabs have been coerced/forced on Australians and being mandated for ever increasing population sectors – this grossly violating universal informed consent codes.
    Also Paper from Classen Immunotherapies.

    PLEASE READ THESE PAPERS AS OUR POLITICIANS are incapable of (allegedly) independent and unbiased research as their extreme pro-vaccination lobby involvement/stance proves and allegedly throughout the entire Australian Government Vaccinations Policy is rife with Conflicts of Interest -it’s shocking and they are answerable to no one. Likewise – who in the hell allowed mainstream media empires to be calling the shots and virtual mouthpieces for Pharmaceutical Industry (allegedly) – WRONG WRONG WRONG. They all have to be stopped. Read the Papers – the DIRE WARNINGS.

    READ READ READ PLEASE EVERYONE AND SPREAD EVERYWHERE >

    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VACCINE THEORY, PRACTICE AND RESEARCH IJVTPR
    Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible
    Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines
    Against COVID-19
    Stephanie Seneff and Greg Nigh
    Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge MA, 02139, USA, E-mail:
    [email protected]
    Naturopathic Oncology, Immersion Health, Portland, OR 97214, USA
    Operation Warp Speed brought to market in the United States two mRNA vaccines, produced by Pfizer and
    Moderna. Interim data suggested high efficacy for both of these vaccines, which helped legitimize Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA. However, the exceptionally rapid movement of these vaccines through controlled trials and into mass deployment raises multiple safety concerns. In this review we first describe the technology underlying these vaccines in detail. We then review both components of and the intended biological response to these vaccines, including production of the spike protein itself, and their potential relationship to a wide range of both acute and long-term induced pathologies, such as blood disorders, neurodegenerative diseases and autoimmune diseases. Among these potential induced pathologies, we discuss the relevance of prion-protein-related amino acid sequences within the spike protein. We also present a brief review of studies supporting the potential for spike protein “shedding”, transmission of the protein from a vaccinated to an unvaccinated person, resulting in symptoms induced in the latter. We finish by addressing a common point of debate, namely, whether or not these vaccines could modify the DNA of those receiving the vaccination. While there are no studies demonstrating definitively that this is happening, we provide a plausible scenario, supported by previously established pathways for transformation and transport of genetic material, whereby injected mRNA could ultimately be incorporated into germ cell DNA for transgenerational transmission. We conclude with our recommendations regarding surveillance that will help to clarify the long-term effects of these experimental drugs and allow us to better assess the true risk/benefit ratio of these novel technologies.
    Full Paper >
    https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Boards/BOH/Meetings/2021/SENEFF~1.PDF

    COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease
    Classen Immunotherapies, Inc., 3637 Rockdale Road, Manchester
    MD 21102, E-mail: [email protected]
    J. Bart Classen, MD*
    Development of new vaccine technology has been plagued with problems in the past. The current RNA based SARSCoV-2 vaccines were approved in the US using an emergency order without extensive long term safety testing. In this paper the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated for the potential to induce prion-based disease in vaccine recipients. The RNA sequence of the vaccine as well as the spike protein target interaction were analyzed for the potential to convert intracellular RNA binding proteins TAR DNA binding protein (TDP-43) and Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) into their pathologic prion conformations. The results indicate that the vaccine RNA has specific sequences that may induce TDP-43 and FUS to fold into their pathologic prion confirmations. In the current analysis a total of sixteen UG tandem repeats (ΨGΨG) were identified and additional UG (ΨG) rich sequences were identified. Two GGΨA sequences were found. Potential G Quadruplex sequences are possibly present but a more sophisticated computer program is needed to verify these. Furthermore, the spike protein, created by the translation of the vaccine RNA, binds angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a zinc containing enzyme. This interaction has the potential to increase intracellular zinc. Zinc ions have been shown to cause the transformation of TDP-43 to its pathologic prion configuration.
    The folding of TDP-43 and FUS into their pathologic prion confirmations is known to cause ALS, front temporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological degenerative diseases.
    The enclosed finding as well as additional potential risks leads the author to believe that regulatory approval of the RNA based vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 was premature and that the vaccine may cause much more harm than benefit.
    Full Paper >
    https://dundasvalley.files.wordpress.com/2021/03/covid19-rna-based-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-prion-disease-1503.pdf