There have been ZERO recorded COVID-19 associated deaths in children under 19 years of age in Australia. The Government has said themselves that infants, children and young people are less likely to be infected than adults. 

Yet, the New South Wales Health Minister Brad Hazzard fast-tracked 24,000 grade 12 students from the eight impacted local government areas giving them a “golden opportunity” to get vaccinated at Qudos Bank Arena last week. There are three unconfirmed reports of death as a result of this mass vaccination that took place. 

But that’s not enough; the NSW health authorities now have their sights set on all children between 12 and 15, with a request for authorisation currently before Australia’s national immunisation body (TGA). Where does it end?

The Doherty Institute provides modelling in response to the Covid pandemic to the National Cabinet. The Chief Health Officer and politicians refer to the Doherty Modelling in most press conferences and in the media. 

The Doherty Modelling Report states;

“Expanding the vaccine program to the 12–15-year age group has minimal impact on transmission and clinical outcomes for any achieved level of vaccine uptake.

Why are the NSW government pushing for 12-15-year-olds to be vaccinated? 

Dr Kerry Chant recently said, “vaccinating 12-15 year-olds will be an important control strategy“.

If this report by the Doherty Institute is a guideline for the National Cabinet, why are they adamant on vaccinating school children when reportedly it changes NOTHING? 


School principals, Kindergarten Directors, Childcare Centres – you all have a duty of care to inform yourselves before making any demands on parents to have their children injected.  Now that there is this massive push to vaccinate our precious children. 

Please spend the time to watch the below videos, with information from esteemed doctors, scientists, and industry whistleblowers who are at the top of their game and were highly respected prior to Covid. They have all been attempting to warn of the very real dangers of the vaccine. These doctors and scientists have nothing to gain from sharing their truth – but everything to lose – funding, careers and reputations.


All Risk. Zero Benefit.

Dr Michael Yeadon (Former Pfizer VP)

Dr Vladimir Zelenko (Nobel Peace Prize Nominee)

Dr Peter McCullough

Dr Ryan Cole

Professor Sucharit Bhakdi

Dr Roger Hodkinson

Luc Montagnier – Nobel Laureate

Lawyer – Dr Reiner Fuelmich

Excellent video/cartoon overview

Coronavirus (COVID-19) case numbers and statistics | Australian Government Department of Health

Official Link:

Related Stories


  1. Incredible resource Monica. You are a legend. Have you got info handy on the liability issues / legal implications for schools & death or adverse reactions? I’ll track down otherwise. Thank YOU so much for your hard work.

  2. COVID VACCINES – DIRE WARNINGS in this Paper by Seneff & Nigh – damage from these vaccines is potentially catastrophic and transgenerational – and now they have targets on our children.
    The rats will be scurrying from an exploding ship when the population learn the true facts of these shocking experimental covid vaccines – please read these papers – I note today, that already as at 16.9.2021 23,751,922 of these experimental jabs have been coerced/forced on Australians and being mandated for ever increasing population sectors – this grossly violating universal informed consent codes.
    Also Paper from Classen Immunotherapies.

    PLEASE READ THESE PAPERS AS OUR POLITICIANS are incapable of (allegedly) independent and unbiased research as their extreme pro-vaccination lobby involvement/stance proves and allegedly throughout the entire Australian Government Vaccinations Policy is rife with Conflicts of Interest -it’s shocking and they are answerable to no one. Likewise – who in the hell allowed mainstream media empires to be calling the shots and virtual mouthpieces for Pharmaceutical Industry (allegedly) – WRONG WRONG WRONG. They all have to be stopped. Read the Papers – the DIRE WARNINGS.


    Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible
    Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines
    Against COVID-19
    Stephanie Seneff and Greg Nigh
    Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge MA, 02139, USA, E-mail:
    [email protected]
    Naturopathic Oncology, Immersion Health, Portland, OR 97214, USA
    Operation Warp Speed brought to market in the United States two mRNA vaccines, produced by Pfizer and
    Moderna. Interim data suggested high efficacy for both of these vaccines, which helped legitimize Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA. However, the exceptionally rapid movement of these vaccines through controlled trials and into mass deployment raises multiple safety concerns. In this review we first describe the technology underlying these vaccines in detail. We then review both components of and the intended biological response to these vaccines, including production of the spike protein itself, and their potential relationship to a wide range of both acute and long-term induced pathologies, such as blood disorders, neurodegenerative diseases and autoimmune diseases. Among these potential induced pathologies, we discuss the relevance of prion-protein-related amino acid sequences within the spike protein. We also present a brief review of studies supporting the potential for spike protein “shedding”, transmission of the protein from a vaccinated to an unvaccinated person, resulting in symptoms induced in the latter. We finish by addressing a common point of debate, namely, whether or not these vaccines could modify the DNA of those receiving the vaccination. While there are no studies demonstrating definitively that this is happening, we provide a plausible scenario, supported by previously established pathways for transformation and transport of genetic material, whereby injected mRNA could ultimately be incorporated into germ cell DNA for transgenerational transmission. We conclude with our recommendations regarding surveillance that will help to clarify the long-term effects of these experimental drugs and allow us to better assess the true risk/benefit ratio of these novel technologies.
    Full Paper >

    COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease
    Classen Immunotherapies, Inc., 3637 Rockdale Road, Manchester
    MD 21102, E-mail: [email protected]
    J. Bart Classen, MD*
    Development of new vaccine technology has been plagued with problems in the past. The current RNA based SARSCoV-2 vaccines were approved in the US using an emergency order without extensive long term safety testing. In this paper the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated for the potential to induce prion-based disease in vaccine recipients. The RNA sequence of the vaccine as well as the spike protein target interaction were analyzed for the potential to convert intracellular RNA binding proteins TAR DNA binding protein (TDP-43) and Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) into their pathologic prion conformations. The results indicate that the vaccine RNA has specific sequences that may induce TDP-43 and FUS to fold into their pathologic prion confirmations. In the current analysis a total of sixteen UG tandem repeats (ΨGΨG) were identified and additional UG (ΨG) rich sequences were identified. Two GGΨA sequences were found. Potential G Quadruplex sequences are possibly present but a more sophisticated computer program is needed to verify these. Furthermore, the spike protein, created by the translation of the vaccine RNA, binds angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a zinc containing enzyme. This interaction has the potential to increase intracellular zinc. Zinc ions have been shown to cause the transformation of TDP-43 to its pathologic prion configuration.
    The folding of TDP-43 and FUS into their pathologic prion confirmations is known to cause ALS, front temporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological degenerative diseases.
    The enclosed finding as well as additional potential risks leads the author to believe that regulatory approval of the RNA based vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 was premature and that the vaccine may cause much more harm than benefit.
    Full Paper >