A Sad and Shameful Day for Australian Medicine
September 10, 2021, was a black day, the day a group of faceless bureaucrats known as the “Advisory Committee for Medicines Scheduling”, through its effector arm, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), compromised medical practise and the health of their fellow Australians. The TGA used its regulatory muscle to prevent doctors at the COVID-19 pandemic’s coalface from prescribing ivermectin (IVM), the one therapy available that is safe, cheap and which reduces mortality in the order of 60 per cent. This poorly conceived action threatens the high standards of medical practise we have achieved in Australia, and the credibility of the administrative structure within which medicine operates.
“A Royal Comission is needed into the TGA and the head of the TGA should resign immediately.”
Craig Kelly
Responses
COVID VACCINES – DIRE WARNINGS in this Paper by Seneff & Nigh – damage from these vaccines is potentially catastrophic and transgenerational – and now they have targets on our children.
The rats will be scurrying from an exploding ship when the population learn the true facts of these shocking experimental covid vaccines – please read these papers – I note today, that already as at 16.9.2021 23,751,922 of these experimental jabs have been coersed/forced on Australians and being mandated for ever increasing population sectors – this grossly violating universal informed consent codes.
Also Paper from Classen Immunotherapies.
PLEASE READ THESE PAPERS AS OUR POLITICIANS are incapable of (allegedly) independent and unbiased research as their extreme pro-vaccination lobby involement/stance proves and allegedly the conflicts of interest throughout the entire Australian Government Vaccinations Policy is rife with Conflicts of Interest -it’s shocking and they are answerable to no one. Likewise – who in the hell allowed mainstream media empires to be calling the shots and virtual mouthpieces for Pharmaceutical Industry (allegedly) – WRONG WRONG WRONG. They all have to be stopped. Read the Papers – the DIRE WARNINGS.
READ READ READ PLEASE EVERYONE AND SPREAD EVERYWHERE >
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VACCINE THEORY, PRACTICE AND RESEARCH IJVTPR
Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible
Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines
Against COVID-19
Stephanie Seneff and Greg Nigh
Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge MA, 02139, USA, E-mail:
seneff@csail.mit.edu
Naturopathic Oncology, Immersion Health, Portland, OR 97214, USA
Operation Warp Speed brought to market in the United States two mRNA vaccines, produced by Pfizer and
Moderna. Interim data suggested high efficacy for both of these vaccines, which helped legitimize Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA. However, the exceptionally rapid movement of these vaccines through controlled trials and into mass deployment raises multiple safety concerns. In this review we first describe the technology underlying these vaccines in detail. We then review both components of and the intended biological response to these vaccines, including production of the spike protein itself, and their potential relationship to a wide range of both acute and long-term induced pathologies, such as blood disorders, neurodegenerative diseases and autoimmune diseases. Among these potential induced pathologies, we discuss the relevance of prion-protein-related amino acid sequences within the spike protein. We also present a brief review of studies supporting the potential for spike protein “shedding”, transmission of the protein from a vaccinated to an unvaccinated person, resulting in symptoms induced in the latter. We finish by addressing a common point of debate, namely, whether or not these vaccines could modify the DNA of those receiving the vaccination. While there are no studies demonstrating definitively that this is happening, we provide a plausible scenario, supported by previously established pathways for transformation and transport of genetic material, whereby injected mRNA could ultimately be incorporated into germ cell DNA for transgenerational transmission. We conclude with our recommendations regarding surveillance that will help to clarify the long-term effects of these experimental drugs and allow us to better assess the true risk/benefit ratio of these novel technologies.
Full Paper >
https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Boards/BOH/Meetings/2021/SENEFF~1.PDF
COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease
Classen Immunotherapies, Inc., 3637 Rockdale Road, Manchester
MD 21102, E-mail: classen@vaccines.net
J. Bart Classen, MD*
Development of new vaccine technology has been plagued with problems in the past. The current RNA based SARSCoV-2 vaccines were approved in the US using an emergency order without extensive long term safety testing. In this paper the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated for the potential to induce prion-based disease in vaccine recipients. The RNA sequence of the vaccine as well as the spike protein target interaction were analyzed for the potential to convert intracellular RNA binding proteins TAR DNA binding protein (TDP-43) and Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) into their pathologic prion conformations. The results indicate that the vaccine RNA has specific sequences that may induce TDP-43 and FUS to fold into their pathologic prion confirmations. In the current analysis a total of sixteen UG tandem repeats (ΨGΨG) were identified and additional UG (ΨG) rich sequences were identified. Two GGΨA sequences were found. Potential G Quadruplex sequences are possibly present but a more sophisticated computer program is needed to verify these. Furthermore, the spike protein, created by the translation of the vaccine RNA, binds angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a zinc containing enzyme. This interaction has the potential to increase intracellular zinc. Zinc ions have been shown to cause the transformation of TDP-43 to its pathologic prion configuration.
The folding of TDP-43 and FUS into their pathologic prion confirmations is known to cause ALS, front temporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological degenerative diseases.
The enclosed finding as well as additional potential risks leads the author to believe that regulatory approval of the RNA based vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 was premature and that the vaccine may cause much more harm than benefit.
Full Paper >
https://dundasvalley.files.wordpress.com/2021/03/covid19-rna-based-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-prion-disease-1503.pdf
Thanks be for the likes of Craig Kelly and Mark Latham and all the other public figures and public-employed people speaking out.
I agree with Craig Kelly, and it is also time for more Royal
Commissions for the corruption all around Australia, in
particular Melbourne. I just watched a video from the U.K.
A funeral director (whistleblower) has indeed opened a
can of worms, firstly about the bodies he picked up were
marked “Covid” and were not covid, now it is more people
of all ages who have died weeks after having the second
jab. When will more people wake up!!
COVID-19 VACCINE ASTRAZENACA – AUSTRALIAN PRODUCT INFORMATION – TGA THERAPEUTIC GOODS ADMINISTRATION – AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT
COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca
(ChAdOx1-S) solution for injection
This vaccine is subject to additional monitoring in Australia. This will allow quick identification of new safety information.
COMMENT BY DDB > TRANSLATION > (allegedly) THE POPULATION ARE OUR GLOBAL LAB RATS AND THERE’S NOT A DAM THING YOU CAN DO TO STOP US !!!
Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected
adverse events at http://www.tga.gov.au/reporting-problems.
Extract >
6 PHARMACEUTICAL PARTICULARS
6.1 LIST OF EXCIPIENTS
COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca contains the excipients histidine, histidine hydrochloride
monohydrate, sodium chloride, magnesium chloride hexahydrate, disodium edetate (EDTA), sucrose, ethanol absolute, polysorbate 80 and water for injections
Toxicity and local tolerance studies
Non-clinical data obtained from toxicology and local tolerance studies with investigational vaccines utilising the same ChAdOx1 adenoviral vector vaccine technology as COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, concluded that the ChAdOx1 technology was well tolerated in mice and was not associated with any adverse effects.
Genotoxicity
COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca is a vaccine, as such, genotoxicity (mutagenicity) studies have not been conducted.
Carcinogenicity
COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca is a vaccine, as such, carcinogenicity studies have not been conducted.
Use in the elderly
There are currently limited data available for the efficacy and safety in individuals over 65 years of age. Further information will be collected from ongoing clinical studies and post-market monitoring.
The decision to immunise an elderly patient should be decided on a case-by-case basis with consideration of age, co-morbidities, their environment, potential benefits and potential risks.
Use in individuals with significant co-morbidities
There are currently limited data available for the efficacy and safety in individuals with significant co-morbidities.
The decision to immunise an individual should be made on the basis of potential benefits over risks to that individual.
Paediatric use
The safety and efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca in children and adolescents (aged No data available for human effects or other effects especially injected into humans
https://www.cdhfinechemical.com/images/product/msds/132_551244222_L-HISTIDINE-CASNO-71-00-1-MSDS.pdf
MSDS HISTIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE MONOHYDRATE – Industrial Use
No data available for human effects or other effects especially injected into humans
https://www.lobachemie.com/lab-chemical-msds/MSDS-LHISTIDINE-HYDROCHLORIDE-MONOHYDRATE-CASNO-5934-29-04067-EN.aspx
MSDS SODIUM CHLORIDE
Potential Health Effects
Eye: May cause eye irritation. Exposure to solid may cause pain and redness.
Skin: May cause skin irritation. May be harmful if absorbed through the skin.
Ingestion: May cause irritation of the digestive tract. May be harmful if swallowed.
Inhalation: May cause respiratory tract irritation. May be harmful if inhaled.
The toxicological properties have not been fully investigated.
Comment > No data available for human effects or other effects especially injected into humans
http://www.srlchem.com/msds/7647-14-5.pdf
MSDS ETHANOL ABSOLUTE
Laboratory reagent. Cleaning agent. Antifreeze liquid.
Signal word Danger
This is for ‘exposure’ to it – nothing injected into humans >
The severity of the symptoms described will vary dependent on the concentration and the length of exposure.
Inhalation May cause respiratory irritation. Coughing, chest tightness, feeling of chest pressure.
Ingestion May cause nausea, headache, dizziness and intoxication. Pneumonia may be the result if vomited material containing solvents reaches the lungs.
Skin contact Liquid may irritate skin. Dry skin.
Eye contact Repeated exposure may cause chronic eye irritation
Serious eye damage/irritation
Serious eye damage/irritation Irritating
Respiratory sensitisation
Respiratory sensitisation Based on available data the classification criteria are not met.
Skin sensitisation
Skin sensitisation – Guinea pig: Not sensitising.
Germ cell mutagenicity
Genotoxicity – in vitro Bacterial reverse mutation test: Negative.
Genotoxicity – in vivo Chromosome aberration: Negative.
Carcinogenicity
Carcinogenicity NOAEL > 4250 mg/kg/day, Oral, Mouse
Reproductive toxicity
Reproductive toxicity – fertility Based on available data the classification criteria are not met.
Specific target organ toxicity – single exposure
STOT – single exposure Based on available data the classification criteria are not met.
Specific target organ toxicity – repeated exposure
STOT – repeated exposure LOAEL 3160 mg/kg, Oral, Rat
Target organs Kidneys
Revision date: 06/12/2017 Revision: 4 Supersedes date: 04/08/2016
ETHANOL ABSOLUTE
Inhalation Vapours may cause drowsiness and dizziness.
Ingestion May cause nausea, headache, dizziness and intoxication. May cause stomach pain or vomiting. Unconsciousness, possibly death.
Skin contact May be absorbed through the skin. Product has a defatting effect on skin. May cause irritation.
Eye contact Irritating to eyes.
Target organs Central nervous system
Comment > No data available for human effects or other effects especially injected into humans
https://www.chemicals.co.uk/uploads/documents/44%20-%202123%20-%20SDS20385.pdf
MSDS POLYSORBATE 80
Classification of the substance or mixture
Classification
Skin corrosion/irritation, Category 3
Serious eye damage/eye irritation, Category 2B
Specific target organ toxicity- single exposure, Category 3 (respiratory system)
Signal word: WARNING
Hazard and precautionary statements
Hazard Statements
H316 Causes mild skin irritation.
H320 Causes eye irritation.
H335 May cause respiratory irritation.
Most Important Symptoms/Effects, Acute and Delayed
Ingestion: Toxic effects are not expected due to significant acute toxic ingestion of small amounts of
this product. In large amounts may cause: Intestinal obstruction.
Inhalation: May cause irritation of the nose, throat, and respiratory tract.
Skin-Causes: Slight irritation.
Eyes-Causes: Irritation.
No other data available
Comment > No data available for human effects or other effects especially injected into humans
https://www.parchem.com/siteimages/Attachment/GHS%20Polysorbate%2080%20MSDS.pdf
AS OUR POLITICIANS are incapable of (allegedly) independent and unbiased research as their extreme pro-vaccination lobby involvement/stance proves and allegedly throughout the entire Australian Government Vaccinations Policy is rife with Conflicts of Interest – it’s shocking and they are answerable to no one.
Likewise with the alleged conflicts of interests therein > who in the hell allowed mainstream media empires to be calling the shots and virtual mouthpieces for Pharmaceutical Industry (allegedly) – WRONG WRONG WRONG. They all have to be stopped.
We’ve had a gut full of mainstream media who allegedly have massive conflicts of interest – why is there no independent body to rip them down.
Most politicians and their interests/agendas (allegedly) (thank God for the ones fighting for truth and fighting for populations’ democratic/medical rights and freedoms) – the former drunk on power/control and money, mainstream medicine and their interests’ (particularly big pharmaceutical/vaccine industries/mainstream media) have all allegedly, recklessly, negligently and wilfully, abandoned all due dilligence, duty of care, precautionary principle, truth, respect, ethics, integrity and honour and the first do no harm rule and they have allegedly committed a most foul breach/violation of Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights and The Nuremberg Code and those people in Governments submitting the people to tyrannical control must be voted out and those Honorable Politicians fighting for our democratic/medical freedoms, rights and all right and freedoms must be supported and voted in by the people.
I think all hell globally is going to break loose on this APPALLING HUMAN RIGHTS AND HEALTH RIGHTS MOST ABHORRENT VIOLATIONS BY GOVERNMENTS.
INFORMED CONSENT
ANY FORCED MEDICAL/DENTAL TREATMENT OR ANY TREATMENT IS A GROSS VIOLATION OF INFORMED CONSENT/NUREMBERG CODE
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH – THE NUREMBERG CODE
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.
https://history.nih.gov/display/history/Niremberg+Code
Also see >
For more information see Nuremberg Doctor’s Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75. http://bmj.com/content/vol313/issue7070/#NUREMBERG
Do Mandatory Masks and Vaccines Break the 10 Points of the Nuremburg Code?
by Makia Freeman / February 11th, 2021
Conclusion
Society is regressing right now. We are giving up hard-fought rights and freedoms out of fear. Collectively, we are forgetting that we have already long ago established fundamental human rights such as bodily autonomy, medical sovereignty and informed, voluntary consent.
The Nuremburg Code is a stark reminder that we have been through all this before, and got through it to crystallize the lessons learned. We must remember Who We Are and stop this insane COVID medical experimentation – before it’s too late.
Full article >
https://dissidentvoice.org/2021/02/do-mandatory-masks-and-vaccines-break-the-10-points-of-the-nuremburg-code/
My sincere apologies – I made an error in post previously – here is the corrected one. So sorry, Diane
COVID-19 VACCINE ASTRAZENACA – AUSTRALIAN PRODUCT INFORMATION – TGA THERAPEUTIC GOODS ADMINISTRATION – AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT
COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca
(ChAdOx1-S) solution for injection
This vaccine is subject to additional monitoring in Australia. This will allow quick identification of new safety information.
COMMENT BY DDB > TRANSLATION > (allegedly) THE POPULATION ARE OUR GLOBAL LAB RATS AND THERE’S NOT A DAM THING YOU CAN DO TO STOP US !!!
Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse events at http://www.tga.gov.au/reporting-problems.
Extract >
6 PHARMACEUTICAL PARTICULARS
6.1 LIST OF EXCIPIENTS
COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca contains the excipients histidine, histidine hydrochloride monohydrate, sodium chloride, magnesium chloride hexahydrate, disodium edetate (EDTA), sucrose, ethanol absolute, polysorbate 80 and water for injections
Toxicity and local tolerance studies
Non-clinical data obtained from toxicology and local tolerance studies with investigational vaccines utilising the same ChAdOx1 adenoviral vector vaccine technology as COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, concluded that the ChAdOx1 technology was well tolerated in mice and was not associated with any adverse effects.
Genotoxicity
COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca is a vaccine, as such, genotoxicity (mutagenicity) studies have not been conducted.
Carcinogenicity
COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca is a vaccine, as such, carcinogenicity studies have not been conducted.
Use in the elderly
There are currently limited data available for the efficacy and safety in individuals over 65 years of age. Further information will be collected from ongoing clinical studies and post-market monitoring.
The decision to immunise an elderly patient should be decided on a case-by-case basis with consideration of age, co-morbidities, their environment, potential benefits and potential risks.
Use in individuals with significant co-morbidities
There are currently limited data available for the efficacy and safety in individuals with significant co-morbidities.
The decision to immunise an individual should be made on the basis of potential benefits over risks to that individual.
Paediatric use
The safety and efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca in children and adolescents (aged No data available for human effects or other effects especially injected into humans
https://www.cdhfinechemical.com/images/product/msds/132_551244222_L-HISTIDINE-CASNO-71-00-1-MSDS.pdf
MSDS HISTIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE MONOHYDRATE – Industrial Use
Comment > No data available for human effects or other effects especially injected into humans
https://www.lobachemie.com/lab-chemical-msds/MSDS-LHISTIDINE-HYDROCHLORIDE-MONOHYDRATE-CASNO-5934-29-04067-EN.aspx
MSDS SODIUM CHLORIDE
Potential Health Effects
Eye: May cause eye irritation. Exposure to solid may cause pain and redness.
Skin: May cause skin irritation. May be harmful if absorbed through the skin.
Ingestion: May cause irritation of the digestive tract. May be harmful if swallowed.
Inhalation: May cause respiratory tract irritation. May be harmful if inhaled.
The toxicological properties have not been fully investigated.
Comment > No data available for human effects or other effects especially injected into humans
http://www.srlchem.com/msds/7647-14-5.pdf
MSDS ETHANOL ABSOLUTE
Laboratory reagent. Cleaning agent. Antifreeze liquid.
Signal word Danger
This is for ‘exposure’ to it – nothing injected into humans >
The severity of the symptoms described will vary dependent on the concentration and the length of exposure.
Inhalation May cause respiratory irritation. Coughing, chest tightness, feeling of chest pressure.
Ingestion May cause nausea, headache, dizziness and intoxication. Pneumonia may be the result if vomited material containing solvents reaches the lungs.
Skin contact Liquid may irritate skin. Dry skin.
Eye contact Repeated exposure may cause chronic eye irritation
Serious eye damage/irritation
Serious eye damage/irritation Irritating
Respiratory sensitisation
Respiratory sensitisation Based on available data the classification criteria are not met.
Skin sensitisation
Skin sensitisation – Guinea pig: Not sensitising.
Germ cell mutagenicity
Genotoxicity – in vitro Bacterial reverse mutation test: Negative.
Genotoxicity – in vivo Chromosome aberration: Negative.
Carcinogenicity
Carcinogenicity NOAEL > 4250 mg/kg/day, Oral, Mouse
Reproductive toxicity
Reproductive toxicity – fertility Based on available data the classification criteria are not met.
Specific target organ toxicity – single exposure
STOT – single exposure Based on available data the classification criteria are not met.
Specific target organ toxicity – repeated exposure
STOT – repeated exposure LOAEL 3160 mg/kg, Oral, Rat
Target organs Kidneys
Revision date: 06/12/2017 Revision: 4 Supersedes date: 04/08/2016
ETHANOL ABSOLUTE
Inhalation Vapours may cause drowsiness and dizziness.
Ingestion May cause nausea, headache, dizziness and intoxication. May cause stomach pain or vomiting. Unconsciousness, possibly death.
Skin contact May be absorbed through the skin. Product has a defatting effect on skin. May cause irritation.
Eye contact Irritating to eyes.
Target organs Central nervous system
Comment > No data available for human effects or other effects especially injected into humans
https://www.chemicals.co.uk/uploads/documents/44%20-%202123%20-%20SDS20385.pdf
MSDS POLYSORBATE 80
Classification of the substance or mixture
Classification
Skin corrosion/irritation, Category 3
Serious eye damage/eye irritation, Category 2B
Specific target organ toxicity- single exposure, Category 3 (respiratory system)
Signal word: WARNING
Hazard and precautionary statements
Hazard Statements
H316 Causes mild skin irritation.
H320 Causes eye irritation.
H335 May cause respiratory irritation.
Most Important Symptoms/Effects, Acute and Delayed
Ingestion: Toxic effects are not expected due to significant acute toxic ingestion of small amounts of
this product. In large amounts may cause: Intestinal obstruction.
Inhalation: May cause irritation of the nose, throat, and respiratory tract.
Skin-Causes: Slight irritation.
Eyes-Causes: Irritation.
No other data available
Comment > No data available for human effects or other effects especially injected into humans
https://www.parchem.com/siteimages/Attachment/GHS%20Polysorbate%2080%20MSDS.pdf
AS OUR POLITICIANS are incapable of (allegedly) independent and unbiased research as their extreme pro-vaccination lobby involvement/stance proves and allegedly throughout the entire Australian Government Vaccinations Policy is rife with Conflicts of Interest – it’s shocking and they are answerable to no one. Likewise with the alleged conflicts of interests therein > who in the hell allowed mainstream media empires to be calling the shots and virtual mouthpieces for Pharmaceutical Industry (allegedly) – WRONG WRONG WRONG. They all have to be stopped.
We’ve had a gut full of mainstream media who allegedly have massive conflicts of interest – why is there no independent body to rip them down.
Most politicians and their interests/agendas (allegedly) (thank God for the ones fighting for truth and fighting for populations’ democratic/medical rights and freedoms) – the former drunk on power/control and money, mainstream medicine and their interests’ (particularly big pharmaceutical/vaccine industries/mainstream media) have all allegedly, recklessly, negligently and wilfully, abandoned all due dilligence, duty of care, precautionary principle, truth, respect, ethics, integrity and honour and the first do no harm rule and they have allegedly committed a most foul breach/violation of Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights and The Nuremberg Code and those people in Governments submitting the people to tyrannical control must be voted out and those Honorable Politicians fighting for our democratic/medical freedoms, rights and all right and freedoms must be supported and voted in by the people.
I think all hell globally is going to break loose on this APPALLING HUMAN RIGHTS AND HEALTH RIGHTS MOST ABHORRENT VIOLATIONS BY GOVERNMENTS.
INFORMED CONSENT
ANY FORCED MEDICAL/DENTAL TREATMENT OR ANY TREATMENT IS A GROSS VIOLATION OF INFORMED CONSENT/NUREMBERG CODE
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH – THE NUREMBERG CODE
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.
https://history.nih.gov/display/history/Niremberg+Code
Also see >
For more information see Nuremberg Doctor’s Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75. http://bmj.com/content/vol313/issue7070/#NUREMBERG
Do Mandatory Masks and Vaccines Break the 10 Points of the Nuremburg Code?
by Makia Freeman / February 11th, 2021
Conclusion
Society is regressing right now. We are giving up hard-fought rights and freedoms out of fear. Collectively, we are forgetting that we have already long ago established fundamental human rights such as bodily autonomy, medical sovereignty and informed, voluntary consent.
The Nuremburg Code is a stark reminder that we have been through all this before, and got through it to crystallize the lessons learned. We must remember Who We Are and stop this insane COVID medical experimentation – before it’s too late.
Full article >
https://dissidentvoice.org/2021/02/do-mandatory-masks-and-vaccines-break-the-10-points-of-the-nuremburg-code/
Dear RDA and all, I have to get some sleep – if RDA wants me to repost this TGA AstraZenaca product information again in it’s entirety as previously posted, please let me know – because I can’t believe it but whoops I’ve done it again.
Here is the COVID-19 VACCINE ASTRAZENACA AUSTRALIAN PRODUCT INFORMATION – TGA THERAPEUTIC GOODS ADMINISTRATION – AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT section on its own with the correct link shown >
COVID-19 VACCINE ASTRAZENACA – AUSTRALIAN PRODUCT INFORMATION – TGA THERAPEUTIC GOODS ADMINISTRATION – AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT
COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca
(ChAdOx1-S) solution for injection
This vaccine is subject to additional monitoring in Australia.
This will allow quick identification of new safety information.
COMMENT BY DDB > TRANSLATION > (allegedly) THE POPULATION ARE allegedly OUR GLOBAL LAB RATS AND THERE’S NOT A DAM THING YOU CAN DO TO STOP US !!!
Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse events at >
http://www.tga.gov.au/reporting-problems
Extract >
6 PHARMACEUTICAL PARTICULARS
6.1 LIST OF EXCIPIENTS
COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca contains the excipients histidine, histidine hydrochloride monohydrate, sodium chloride, magnesium chloride hexahydrate, disodium edetate (EDTA), sucrose, ethanol absolute, polysorbate 80 and water for injections Toxicity and local tolerance studies
Non-clinical data obtained from toxicology and local tolerance studies with investigational vaccines utilising the same ChAdOx1 adenoviral vector vaccine technology as COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca, concluded that the ChAdOx1 technology was well tolerated in mice and was not associated with any adverse effects.
Genotoxicity
COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca is a vaccine, as such, genotoxicity (mutagenicity) studies have not been conducted.
Carcinogenicity
COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca is a vaccine, as such, carcinogenicity studies have not been conducted.
Use in the elderly
There are currently limited data available for the efficacy and safety in individuals over 65 years of age. Further information will be collected from ongoing clinical studies and post-market monitoring.
The decision to immunise an elderly patient should be decided on a case-by-case basis with consideration of age, co-morbidities, their environment, potential benefits and potential risks.
Use in individuals with significant co-morbidities
There are currently limited data available for the efficacy and safety in individuals with significant co-morbidities.
The decision to immunise an individual should be made on the basis of potential benefits over risks to that individual.
Paediatric use
The safety and efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca in children and adolescents (aged <18 years old) have not yet been established.
No data are available.
SUMMARY TABLE OF CHANGES
Section changed Summary of new information
4.4 Inclusion of text relating to events of Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia
4.8 Inclusion of text on Blood and lymphatic system disorders: Thrombosis and thrombocytopenia
4.5 INTERACTIONS WITH OTHER MEDICINES AND OTHER FORMS OF
INTERACTIONS
The safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of co-administration of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca with other vaccines have not been evaluated.
4.6 FERTILITY, PREGNANCY AND LACTATION
Effects on fertility
It is unknown whether COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca may impact fertility. No data are available.
5 of 15
Use in pregnancy – Category B2
There are a limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca in pregnant women, or women who became pregnant after receiving the vaccine.
The data are insufficient to inform on vaccine-associated risk.
Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed.
https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/pi-covid-19-vaccine_0.pdf
Well spoken Mr Kelly. Down with this Tyranny. Time for the Swamp to be Drained and Flushed.
Vaccination and the Media – Conflicts of Interest in Australia
39 June, 2020
Around the world there’s a constant barrage of articles in the mainstream corporate media berating ‘anti-vaxxers’ and hindering citizens asking legitimate questions about vaccination policy.
In Australia recently The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age have published a series of articles with an ‘anti-vaxxer’ theme – what is the motive behind the labelling and marginalisation of people who ask questions about vaccination? This is especially important to consider now as research on questionable coronavirus vaccines is being fast-tracked around the world.
Conflicts of interest are clouding this issue.
For an Australian perspective, see below independent vaccination campaigner Elizabeth Hart’s challenge to former politician Peter Costello.
Costello is now Chairman of an Australian Government Investment Fund which includes over a billion dollars’ worth of vaccine company shares, while he also chairs a media company which publishes articles demeaning and marginalising people who question the ever-increasing number of lucrative vaccine products being added to the vaccination schedule.
There’s a murky story to uncover about relationships between the media and vaccine industry…and connections with government.
We the people have to work on exposing this scandal ourselves…
16 June 2020
For the attention of:
Mr Peter Costello
Chairman of the Board of Guardians of the Future Fund
Non-Executive Chairman of Nine Entertainment Co
Dear Mr Costello,
It appears you have alarming conflicts of interest in your roles as Independent Non-Executive Chairman of Nine Entertainment Co, and Chairman of the Board of Guardians of the Future Fund.
Nine Entertainment Co’s media promotes biased articles on vaccination, which ignore citizens’ valid concerns about vaccination policy and the burgeoning number of vaccine products being added to schedules without consultation, while the Future Fund has over a billion dollars invested in companies which inter alia manufacture lucrative vaccine products, i.e. CSL, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, and Merck.
Consider below recent articles published in The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and other publications, which are generally couched as attacks on ‘anti-vaxxers’, and fail to provide critical analysis of complicated matters relevant to taxpayer-funded vaccination policy, i.e.
‘Dangerous’: Researchers note ‘massive uptick’ in anti-vaccination activity. Wendy Tuohy, 14 June 2020
Government must counter misinformation on vaccinations. The Herald’s View, 14 June 2020
Experts warn of new strains of misinformation as COVID-19 seeds conspiracy theories. Tim Biggs, 8 June 2020
‘Slap them down’ or hear them out: How to handle misinformation ‘superspreaders’? Wendy Tuohy, 31 May 2020
‘Act now’: AMA urges health education to combat ‘growing’ anti-vaxxer movement. Max Koslowski, 25 May 2020
Federal ministers flooded with unprecedented level of anti-vaccination mail. Max Koslowski, 24 May 2020
Queensland bans NRL players who refuse flu jab on non-medical grounds. Laine Clark and Scott Bailey, 12 May 2020
Flu-jab duo face potential pay freeze as NRL, Titans brace for courtroom showdown. Michael Chammas and Sarah Keoghan, 11 May 2020
Anti-vaccination activists use coronavirus to push resistance to inoculation. Peter Jamison, 6 May 2020
Vaccination-sceptic political party wins name change despite heavyweight objectors. Zach Hope, 2 May 2020
‘Anti-vaxxers stay home’: Health Minister issues warning, announces new flu vaccine program for all primary school children. Lauren Pilat, 27 April 2020
‘Absolutely insane’: Anti-vaxxers promote coronavirus conspiracies. Caitlin Fitzsimmons and Tom Rabe, 20 April 2020
Meanwhile, CSL/Seqirus receives product promotion and endorsement courtesy of The Sydney Morning Herald, i.e.
‘There will be enough’: CSL to hit record flu vaccine production. (Emma Koehn, 19 April 2020.)
Did CSL/Seqirus pay for this flu vaccine product promotion in The Sydney Morning Herald?
Mr Costello, the Future Fund has invested over a billion dollars in companies which inter alia manufacture vaccine products – it appears you have a conflict of interest in also being Chairman of a corporate media group which discredits and marginalises citizens who question taxpayer-funded vaccination policy, reflexively labelling them as ‘anti-vaccination’. CSL shares valued at $674 million, plus Pfizer shares worth more than $265 million, $251 million of Johnson and Johnson shares, and over $134 million of shares in Merck were equity holdings of the Future Fund Board of Guardians as of 30 June 2019.
$310 million worth of Facebook shares are also listed in the Future Fund portfolio, and it is notable that Facebook is now hindering citizens’ free discussion of matters relevant to vaccine products and policy with its self-appointed ‘fact-checkers’.
Mr Costello, many groups around the world are now working on fast-tracking coronavirus vaccine products, being led by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and with taxpayer-funding from many governments, including at least $352 million from the Australian government.
Please note more discerning citizens will be demanding transparency and accountability for the lucrative vaccine products being pressed upon the global community.
Corporate media groups such as Nine Entertainment Co will also be held accountable for biased reporting which provides unquestioning promotion for vaccine products.
In Australia, News Corp also promotes biased coverage of vaccination matters, without disclosing its own conflict of interest in being a corporate partner of the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, an organisation which is involved in vaccine product research and development.
Rupert Murdoch’s mother Dame Elisabeth Murdoch was involved in the establishment of the original Murdoch Institute, and today Sarah Murdoch is a member of the Board and the Ambassador for the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute.
News Corp tabloids were behind the No Jab, No Play media campaign, which was obligingly adopted as policy by politicians across the political spectrum in Australia, and enacted as the coercive No Jab, No Pay law under Malcolm Turnbull as Prime Minister in January 2016. Members of the coercive vaccination lobby groups SAVN and Friends of Science in Medicine, e.g. John Cunningham and David Hawkes, were influential at the Senate Committee hearing re the No Jab, No Pay Bill in November 2015, which was attended by SAVN supporter Senator Richard Di Natale.
Mr Costello, biased corporate media groups in Australia have failed to provide critical analysis of taxpayer-funded vaccination policy, an area which is awash with conflicts of interest, a situation that has been allowed to fester under both Liberal/Coalition and Labor governments, including during your tenure as a Liberal Member of Parliament. Likewise the taxpayer-funded ABC and SBS have failed to provide critical analysis of vaccination policy, simply acting as unquestioning promoters of vaccine products via their news articles and broadcasts.
I have recently written to Prime Minister Scott Morrison requesting transparency for the various committees and organisations influencing vaccination policy, e.g. the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation; the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee; the National Centre for Immunisation Research & Surveillance; the TGA’s Advisory Committee on Vaccines; the TGA’s Australian Influenza Vaccine Committee; the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute; the Telethon Kids Institute; the Working Group and Oversight Committee for the Australian Academy of Science publication The Science of Immunisation: Questions and Answers; and any other group or organisation influential on Australian vaccination policy.
It’s also notable that members of the industry-funded Immunisation Coalition are very influential in the media and on policy, but seldom disclose that this organisation is funded by vaccine manufacturers Seqirus/CSL, Pfizer, Merck (MSD), GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi. The Immunisation Coalition is also associated with the Australian Medical Association, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and other medical organisations, and is also sponsored by Google and others. Dr Tony Bartone, the current President of the Australian Medical Association, is an Immunisation Coalition member, a fact which is seldom disclosed in media articles. Other members of the Immunisation Coalition who are frequently provided with a soapbox in the media include Professor Robert Booy, Associate Professor Margie Danchin, Dr Katie Attwell and current Chair Dr Rod Pearce, but they seldom disclose they are associated with a vaccine industry-funded organisation.
I have repeatedly brought many matters of concern about vaccination policy to the attention of journalists in Australia, including at The Sydney Morning Herald, and the taxpayer-funded ABC, but there appears to be a determination to ignore conflicts of interest in vaccination policy, and emerging problems with vaccine products.
Mr Costello, please be aware of your conflicts of interest via the Future Fund, and in your position as Chairman of Nine Entertainment Co, and ensure that its media interests fulfil the ideal of the fourth estate and provide balanced and considered analysis of matters relevant to national and international vaccination policy.
I request your response on this matter.
Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent citizen investigating conflicts of interest in vaccination policy and the over-use of vaccine products
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.
Republishing Guidelines
Source >
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/vaccination-and-the-media-conflicts-of-interest-in-australia/