TGA Weekly Safety Report on COVID-19 Vaccines

Much of the data available on the safety of Covid-19 vaccinations comes from the TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration) which releases a weekly safety report on the vaccination. This report focuses on what is termed an AEFI (Adverse Effect Following Immunisation). According to the World Health Organisation, Module 3: Adverse Events Following Immunization, “The adverse effect may be any unfavourable or unintended sign, abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease.” This could mean anything from a minor headache to far more severe consequences.

These statistics put out by the AEFI as of August 15 2021 shows a reporting rate of 3.3 per 1000 doses, meaning that out of all those who received the vaccine, only 0.33% gave a report. 

This totals to 50,597 reports of an AEFI received out of 15,341,039 total doses administered (50,597 people reported receiving an adverse effect).

This may seem like a small amount, but there could be reasons to suspect that these numbers may not reflect the reality of the situation.

Before continuing it must be noted that much of this article is drawn from a video made by Morgan C Jonas. As Morgan makes clear in the video, his statements are his opinion and are not intended to be taken as conclusive fact. This article also contains opinions from the author of this article which likewise are not intended to be taken as conclusive fact. Which opinions are Morgan’s and which opinions belong to this article’s author will be made clear. When a statement is classified as ‘my’ opinion, it is the opinion of the author alone and is not intended to be attributed to Morgan. Any opinions expressed by the author of this article are not necessarily held by Morgan and should not be attributed to him unless explicitly stated otherwise.

Also, note that an AEFI is not necessarily caused by the Covid-19 vaccination. They are merely unintended adverse effects reported after receiving the vaccination and may derive from other factors not caused by the vaccination. 

With that made clear, we can continue.

According to Morgan, while the number of AEFIs may appear low at first glance, this is the result of a misinterpretation of the statistics and not an actual reflection of the actual danger of the vaccination. 

In contrast, AusVax Safety reported on August 16 that out of 2,407,369, 45.7% reported experiencing an AEFI. According to Morgan, if you factor in the number of people who received two doses of the vaccine, the current number could reasonably be interpreted to be 7,010,855 AEFIs.

Morgan further notes that there has not been much encouragement for people to report adverse effects, with political figures such as Daniel Andrews, Scott Morrison, and Greg Hunt not taking steps to encourage those experiencing AEFIs to report their experiences.

In my opinion, due to the lack of public encouragement for vaccinated people to report their AEFIs, it is possible that many people who have experienced such AEFIs might not have considered reporting what happened to them. Likewise, they may have not understood how important reporting AEFIs could be in allowing people to make informed decisions over whether or not to take the vaccination.

Following his previous statements, Morgan concludes that the TGA weekly safety report is not comprehensive and gives scope for misinterpretation.

In my opinion, this scope for misinterpretation could lead people to have a false sense of security when taking the vaccination and not consider the potential side effects which could arise from taking the vaccine. In my opinion, this prevents them from making informed decisions about whether or not to take the vaccine if they either misinterpreted that data or were convinced by others who misread the data.

In conclusion, if the data from the TGA are presented to you to encourage you to take the vaccination, I believe that you should take the preceding into consideration. In my opinion, this data does not reflect the whole story about the vaccination and should only be considered with a grain of salt when weighing up the risk of the Covid-19 vaccination.

The team at the Morgan C Jonas report is currently working on analysing the data about the Covid-19 vaccination and will be publishing it in written form at mcjreport.com. Morgan will also be talking more about this topic on the MCJ Report in the future.

To view Morgan’s video on this topic, you can find it here:

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Share on telegram
Telegram
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on email
Email

Related Stories

Responses

  1. As far as side effects not being reported – I personally know of one woman whose weren’t reported. She clearly felt it was her duty to bravely endure as many are suffering far worse (from COVID etc.). She had stabbing pain in her head a day or so after the vaccine and was rushed to hospital by her husband. They did tests and saw no sign of inflammation or blood clots which even she thought a bit strange given symptoms. Since then she has had ongoing joint pain and her knees sometimes buckle under her for no reason. All these are new to her. She is about 60. The first person I knew have the vaccine collapsed unconscious at the hospital where she was given it as a dietian there and code blue was called. (I don’t believe this was reported either.)

    1. My brother-in-law (42) is suffering from chest pains and feeling of faintness since having his 2nd Pfizer vaccination about 6 weeks ago. He’s had a cold/flu for 15 days now and prior to being vaccinated was never sick.
      One of our apprentices at work (18), received her 1st vaccination on the 13/8. She did not attend work for 4 days last week as she had a constant headache and couldn’t keep food or water down. She was perfectly fine on the day leading up to her vaccination.
      On Friday evening (20/8), a chef dropped dead in the kitchen of his Thai restaurant after receiving a vaccine that morning.
      I’ll eat my underpants if the local newspaper mentions this episode.😤😤😤

  2. Rubber bullets might sound harmless enough, but many protestors have lost their eyesight in one eye from these rubber bullets. They should not be used against protestors. People have a right to protest despite what any government may say or dictate. Governments can make up rules for anything. It is not easy for people to have their say when the government is operating under emergency conditions and doesn’t even convene for months on end, when social media deplatforms people who don’t go along with the desired narrative. Rubber bullets are not acceptable.

  3. I listened to a speaker recently say that there had been two children deaths following a “Covid Vaccine”. Does anyone have information (plausible) about this? I am in debate about this and everything Covid with my Barrister Son-in-Law. Looking forward to help with this matter. Kim

    1. 3 now 2 on the day and 1 young man had a heart attack and could not be revived after going swimming, parents under gag orders …

  4. I know of several who have had adverse reactions but doubt they were reported. One has had inflammation and pain after the first AZ jab so doctor says not to have the second (although she is considering the pfizer).
    The grand daughter of another in NSW had a stroke 2 weeks after her jab and is lucky to be alive. A third has developed aneurysm and can’t work. I asked if this was reported but its unknown. My guess is none have been. This is as of 24/8/21 People are now getting the jab vecause they think the lockdowns will go away – but thats one of the ways of coercing people and its illegal!

  5. A good friend of mine, a retired police officer living in WA aquired a blood-clot after taking Astrazeneca jab and 4 days later had a stroke. He is still in Fiona Stanley Hospital and not doing well. My uncle in Beechworth Victoria also developed a blood clot after the Astrazeneca jab and was minutes away from having his lower leg amputated. Fortunately his leg was saved but he vows never to be jabbed again.

    1. PS, none of the above adverse side effects have been reported. Can we even put a figure on the unreported vaccine side effects? The govt and medical health juggernaut cover-up coercion is staggering.

  6. COVID VACCINES – DIRE WARNINGS in this Paper by Seneff & Nigh – damage from these vaccines is potentially catastrophic and transgenerational – and now they have targets on our children.
    The rats will be scurrying from an exploding ship when the population learn the true facts of these shocking experimental covid vaccines – please read these papers – I note today, that already as at 16.9.2021 23,751,922 of these experimental jabs have been coerced/forced on Australians and being mandated for ever increasing population sectors – this grossly violating universal informed consent codes.
    Also Paper from Classen Immunotherapies.

    PLEASE READ THESE PAPERS AS OUR POLITICIANS are incapable of (allegedly) independent and unbiased research as their extreme pro-vaccination lobby involvement/stance proves and allegedly throughout the entire Australian Government Vaccinations Policy is rife with Conflicts of Interest -it’s shocking and they are answerable to no one. Likewise – who in the hell allowed mainstream media empires to be calling the shots and virtual mouthpieces for Pharmaceutical Industry (allegedly) – WRONG WRONG WRONG. They all have to be stopped. Read the Papers – the DIRE WARNINGS.

    READ READ READ PLEASE EVERYONE AND SPREAD EVERYWHERE >

    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VACCINE THEORY, PRACTICE AND RESEARCH IJVTPR
    Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible
    Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines
    Against COVID-19
    Stephanie Seneff and Greg Nigh
    Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge MA, 02139, USA, E-mail:
    [email protected]
    Naturopathic Oncology, Immersion Health, Portland, OR 97214, USA
    Operation Warp Speed brought to market in the United States two mRNA vaccines, produced by Pfizer and
    Moderna. Interim data suggested high efficacy for both of these vaccines, which helped legitimize Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA. However, the exceptionally rapid movement of these vaccines through controlled trials and into mass deployment raises multiple safety concerns. In this review we first describe the technology underlying these vaccines in detail. We then review both components of and the intended biological response to these vaccines, including production of the spike protein itself, and their potential relationship to a wide range of both acute and long-term induced pathologies, such as blood disorders, neurodegenerative diseases and autoimmune diseases. Among these potential induced pathologies, we discuss the relevance of prion-protein-related amino acid sequences within the spike protein. We also present a brief review of studies supporting the potential for spike protein “shedding”, transmission of the protein from a vaccinated to an unvaccinated person, resulting in symptoms induced in the latter. We finish by addressing a common point of debate, namely, whether or not these vaccines could modify the DNA of those receiving the vaccination. While there are no studies demonstrating definitively that this is happening, we provide a plausible scenario, supported by previously established pathways for transformation and transport of genetic material, whereby injected mRNA could ultimately be incorporated into germ cell DNA for transgenerational transmission. We conclude with our recommendations regarding surveillance that will help to clarify the long-term effects of these experimental drugs and allow us to better assess the true risk/benefit ratio of these novel technologies.
    Full Paper >
    https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Boards/BOH/Meetings/2021/SENEFF~1.PDF

    COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease
    Classen Immunotherapies, Inc., 3637 Rockdale Road, Manchester
    MD 21102, E-mail: [email protected]
    J. Bart Classen, MD*
    Development of new vaccine technology has been plagued with problems in the past. The current RNA based SARSCoV-2 vaccines were approved in the US using an emergency order without extensive long term safety testing. In this paper the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated for the potential to induce prion-based disease in vaccine recipients. The RNA sequence of the vaccine as well as the spike protein target interaction were analyzed for the potential to convert intracellular RNA binding proteins TAR DNA binding protein (TDP-43) and Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) into their pathologic prion conformations. The results indicate that the vaccine RNA has specific sequences that may induce TDP-43 and FUS to fold into their pathologic prion confirmations. In the current analysis a total of sixteen UG tandem repeats (ΨGΨG) were identified and additional UG (ΨG) rich sequences were identified. Two GGΨA sequences were found. Potential G Quadruplex sequences are possibly present but a more sophisticated computer program is needed to verify these. Furthermore, the spike protein, created by the translation of the vaccine RNA, binds angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a zinc containing enzyme. This interaction has the potential to increase intracellular zinc. Zinc ions have been shown to cause the transformation of TDP-43 to its pathologic prion configuration.
    The folding of TDP-43 and FUS into their pathologic prion confirmations is known to cause ALS, front temporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological degenerative diseases.
    The enclosed finding as well as additional potential risks leads the author to believe that regulatory approval of the RNA based vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 was premature and that the vaccine may cause much more harm than benefit.
    Full Paper >
    https://dundasvalley.files.wordpress.com/2021/03/covid19-rna-based-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-prion-disease-1503.pdf