Thinking of Vaccinating Your Toddler?

You may want to wait forever after you watch this video!

Listen to what UK diagnostic pathologist, Dr Clare Craig, of the Health Advisory & Recovery Team (HART) group has to say about the Pfizer trial that provided the evidence for the FDA’s latest authorisation in her blistering four-minute video.

On June 17th the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorised emergency use of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 genetic vaccines in children as young as six months.

Where the FDA leads, other nations’ medicine regulators often follow – including our own Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).

As Dr Craig says, there were just 10 children who got symptomatic COVID-19 in the period analysed after the third dose of vaccine had had time to take effect. Three children in the vaccine group and seven in the placebo group got COVID-19 during that period.

Based on these few results, Pfizer calculated a vaccine efficacy in the under-fives of 80.3%, and quoted it in their press release.  They typified the efficacy analysis as “descriptive”, which presumably means it was not statistically significant.

However, the FDA did not approve the vaccines based on the results for these ten children.

Instead in the FDA press release, it said that the number of children getting COVID-19 during the period analysed in the trial was too small for reliable conclusions on vaccine efficacy to be made.

Therefore, the trial, as it stood, did not directly prove that vaccinated children were protected from getting COVID-19, but the FDA approved the vaccine for young children anyway. According to the press release, the approval was based on the following logic:

  • The trial shows that children are producing an immune response (presumably antibody levels) “comparable” to that seen in an earlier study in people aged 16-25 years given the injection.
  • Because this level of immune response was “shown to be effective in preventing COVID-19” in the previous study of about 170 older teens and young adults (16-25 years), then these much younger children with similar antibody levels should also be protected from COVID-19.

Although almost 3,000 young children in the trial were vaccinated, immune responses were measured for just a subset of 220 children, including about 80 who were aged less than two years.

And, according to Pfizer’s media team, the “previous study” data for 16-25 year-olds comes from Pfizer’s original trial, which was done in July to November 2020, long before the omicron variant emerged.

One must question the logic of comparing results from that first study – done when the original (Wuhan), alpha and delta strains of the virus were prevalent – with results from this latest trial in very young children, carried out during omicron. It seems apples may be being compared with pears!

Even this latest trial data may be out of date – the world has moved on from the original BA.1 omicron variant and we are now seeing omicron variants BA.4 and BA.5.

It seems that currently, triple- and quadruple-vaccinated people all over the world are getting symptomatic COVID-19, with some dying from the disease.

Surely, one must question whether data from an old trial that claims to show protection from catching COVID-19 after vaccination can be of any relevance when current real-life experience shows that vaccinated people are getting symptomatic COVID-19 in droves?

Note also that the trial tells us nothing about whether the vaccine protects young children from severe COVID-19 or death from the disease – something which is, of course, extremely rare.

The US Centres for Disease Control reports 442 deaths “involving” COVID-19 in children aged under five between 1st April 2020 and 28th May 2022 – so that’s about 221 deaths per year. That means  just 0.0011% of the population of 19.3 million children in that age group died of causes involving COVID-19.

Normally 0.7% of children under five die from all causes in the US each year – that’s 135,109 children annually. Regrettable though any child’s death is, does an extra 0.0011% really constitute an emergency? Remember, these vaccines have just been authorised for “emergency use”.

Turning to safety, the FDA reported that approximately 1,170 children aged under two were vaccinated, but only some 400 of these babies and infants were followed for safety for “at least two months”.

The comparable numbers for children aged two-four years were 1,800 and 600.

One has to wonder why Pfizer did not follow up ALL vaccinated children for safety?

And, considering that a child has their whole life ahead of them, one must ask whether measuring safety over two months is long enough?

Pulling a ludicrous hypothetical example out of the air (so as not to be accused of spreading disinformation) imagine that one in 100,000 babies given the vaccine grew an elephant’s trunk two weeks after vaccination.

With only 1,000 children being tracked for safety, there is a 99% chance that the elephant’s trunk side effect will not be picked up by the trial.

Moreover, if elephant trunks appear in ALL vaccinated children when they reach puberty, this trial would provide no inkling of the hypothetical fate that awaits them!

It is known the Pfizer vaccine can cause myocarditis and pericarditis, especially in boys, a fact recognised by the FDA. There were no such cases reported in the trial, but myocarditis and pericarditis are rare, so that is not surprising in such a small trial. In its authorisation, the FDA mandated ongoing safety monitoring for these heart conditions.

It has also been alleged that an animal study showed that some of the lipid nanoparticles that carry the messenger RNA in the Pfizer vaccine did not stay in the injection site but were “distributed” to the liver, adrenal glands, spleen and ovaries. For the sake of the vaccinated babies, let us hope that the FDA has thoroughly investigated whether this happens in humans and any potential long-term implications.

The dose given in each injection in the Pfizer children’s trial was 3 micrograms, a tenth of the adult dose.

Please pass this article on to all the attentive parents of under-fives that you know, especially those who are not familiar with these genetic based vaccines.

Links used in this story:

Hart Group

Dr Clare Craig’s video

Pfizer press release

FDA Press Release

CDC data on COVID-deaths in children

USAfacts,org data on US population

Statista data on child mortality rate

Lipid nanoparticle distribution information

Latest News


This post is a copy of last night’s mass email. It explains the ‘RDA lives’ comment and other things 🙂 If you’re not subscribed to

Read More »


  1. The Political, Medical, Big Pharma and Big Media Mobsters have never told the truth and never will. They don’t give a damn about people or the deaths/adverse reactions/disabilities from jabs, injections, Vaccines – they never have and you would have more luck getting human excrement from a rocking horse than any in mainstream medicine admitting that vaccines have been and are causing deaths injuries and disabilities.
    It’s not about “health” – it’s always been about total control, power and money and the rest of the population needs to wake up NOW.

    THE DISGRACE OF MAINSTREAM MEDICINE Disgusting that Doctors don’t care about patients. What happened to their sacred Oath “First Do No Harm” and “Informed Consent or Refusal of Medical Treatment”. The power and control of Big Pharma and Big Medicine Big Media and Globalists have destroyed all our rights freedoms and choices. How much longer can this go on the medical terrorising of Populations ?!
    Queensland Teacher’s life ‘ruined’ after severe reaction to Pfizer shot.
    They still demand she has a Second to keep her Teaching Job.
    Government and Medical Tyrannical Lunatics in Power and yet Professor of Law Mr Augusto Zimmerman previously stated that the Government actions are unlawful.
    The Revolving Doors/Corruption/Conflicts of Interest with Big Pharma Big Medicine Big Media and Globalists must be dealt with by the abolition of all mandates which must be abolished permanently and irrevocably for all time.

Thank you for supporting us!

Thank you for supporting the work that RDA does. You can support our work further by volunteering with us.