Exclusive Interview with Tony Nikolic from AFL solicitors explains today’s judgment in Kassam & Henry v Hazzard

RDA is the first to speak to Tony Nikolic after the judgment was handed down at 4 pm today.

We also discuss our upcoming Federal Court Action with Monica Smit as the lead plaintiff.

We don’t lose…we win or we learn!


Join over 15,000 others who have committed to HOLDING THE LINK here –

See the statement of claim below and filing details below.

To HOLD THE LINE please click Here

Latest News


This post is a copy of last night’s mass email. It explains the ‘RDA lives’ comment and other things 🙂 If you’re not subscribed to

Read More »


  1. THANK YOU! Well done Nick for the inspiration. We have come this far guys and look at what Nick has also exposed! What freedoms did we really have?!?!? I think this is great effort!

  2. If possible I believe we need more brainstorming and help from other solicitors. I don’t know if Monica can reveal the funds available for this legal fight but it has to win so, if more support is needed, can’t groups like RDA (and members like us), together with all the people faced with losing their jobs in Australia, join together (particularly financially) to put a really strong case together? There are so many groups and types of professions I feel we need them joined together.

    1. I too can’t help thinking that more could be done to unify various groups.
      As for lawyers, I’m going to be devastatingly cynical here and ask a very rude question, Are even the good ones really any good? I’ve read that all lawyers take a secret oath to the Bar Association that supersedes any oath they take to to the Constitution or anyone or anything else.
      He seems like a nice guy, but how do we know that Tony Nikolic is any different?

      1. PS There are plenty of good arguments against COVID restrictions and mandates, and this law firm has a number of them here-https://www.acfl.com.au/blog/ .
        These arguments are so good that it makes me wonder how governments were able to put these “laws” in to begin. No-one in the machinery of government or the legal profession put their little hand up and asked whether they were even lawful. It also puzzles me as to why we should need lawyers if the arguments are so compelling.
        Maybe some lawyers like Tony Nikolic are trying to change things, but not using everything they’ve got because of their BAR oath. Possibly they want the COVID nonsense to end, but not before they make a lot of money and never at the expense of their BAR oath.

  3. I am interested that this federal case is not looking at the vaccine efficacy as part of the argument of no jab no job. The biosecurity response in law must be proportional to the risk and a vaccine that doesnt lower risk is not proportional.

    1. Good point there about proportionality. We need a case that actually looks at the testing procedure (not suitable, doesn’t work) and the actual “efficacy” of these so-called “vaccines” and the conflict of interest in their rollout, including the control of the TGA by the pharmaceutical giants (testing and then “approving” their own products).

  4. Mr Nikolic, Your tips, advice and templates have been absolutely helpful to me, my family and friends these past few months.
    In regards to what happened today, I’m not surprised, however I am truly grateful for all your hard work, please let us know what we can do to support, we will continue to ‘Hold the Line’, God bless!

  5. people will be out raged to learn the experiment came with a blu tooth nano chip……….the injected can be and are monitored 24/7, absoltue eveidence, install the app
    nRF connect and see

  6. Greg Hunt’s whole family is on the gravy. One of his brothers heads up a Graphene production biotech firm, the other researchers vaccines, while Greg himself pushes them out. Quite a family business.

  7. Wow–it is great to see the Aussie spirit coming through at last. Graham Hood, Monica, Craig Kelly and so many others, speaking out for what is right and good, against these corrupt mob of bastards that are supposed to be running the country on our behalf, but actually for the globalists. Good on you for having the courage to stand up against the tyranny.

      1. Don’t know is more to the point I think Abdon. I doubt too many politicians, lawyers and certainly the general public would know of it’s existence or even the Act of Union. We inherited all English common law at federation, but these corporate governments don’t want anyone to know that.

  8. Tyrants aren’t just going to turn around and say ok you win. Nor are they going to lose via the very system they created and control. Sometimes violence is the answer. It’s been that way since the dawn of time. Eventually Australians will be backed into a corner

    1. We need massive support before the judges will begin to dare to step outside of the present narrative. But we need to look to the long term where we have democracy and the rule of law again. Remember, we are trying to convince people who are good citizens and who really believe they are doing the right thing, but who have been misled. Two things are on our side. One is that the vaccine strategy will eventually collapse under its own weight as a disaster. The second is the mass interest of peaceful civilised people willing to stand up and be counted. We can show our interest by simply joining RDA, watching the court cases, standing peacefully on the streets … anything that gets counted as a mass of people. We undermine our cause in the eyes of people who believe they are being law abiding citizens when we use violence or even talk of violence, because we really need them to trickle over to our side.

  9. It begs the question; What is the point of the Constitution if states can override it? Does this not mean that Federation is doomed and redundant? If states are above the constitution then they are, ipso facto, not part of Australia or arrogantly oppose what the Federal Government has set in stone via the constitution. Bloody shameful.

    1. ScoMo is a different person since he signed that submarine deal. I think he has sold our sovereignty to the NWO and the US green new deal. Our national debt makes us redundant to outside economic forces. Someone else is pulling the strings. Our national laws are useless.

  10. Yes, Hold the Line!
    I believe the judgement was in error because the Judge misunderstood the difference between a constitution and a bill of rights. These are the opposite of each other. A constitution gives rights to the government, and a bill of rights gives rights to us.
    This is critical, because we are a constitutional democracy.
    This means that unless the government has been given the right to limit our freedoms, then the government does NOT have the right to limit us!!! So, under constitutional government, the government needs to prove that they have the right under the constitution. This puts the onus of proof on them.

  11. These chalenges need to be heard in the high court, we do have a bill of rights to free speach and assembly, I saw. But a relevant point relating to the so called mandatory jab the judge made in Kasam V Hazzard was that Hazzard didn’t inject anyone but he encouraged people by making them believe it was mandatory,remember that as Danial Andrews is doing the same ,bluffing, when the mandatory process hasnt even happened.

  12. Thank you Nick and of course also Monica for all you are doing. I try not to waste anyone’s time with my message so I keep it brief. I am Swiss by birth, in Australia since 1968, and so I fully understand the strength of direct democracy, a system I highly value for obvious reasons over an indirect democracy as we have here in Australia.
    The problem we are facing with regards to rapidly loosing our most basic human rights, enshrined in all working democracies around the world, are under attack right across the world! It is clearly an international calamity. I cannot dismiss the “Great Reset” from my mind. In short, it seems that we had to have a “manufactured” pandemic to panic the population causing a mass psychosis. This was followed with a declaration of a “medical emergency” giving unprecedented power to unelected public servants, resulting in insane limitations of our personal freedom, basically by imprisoning supposedly free citizen in a manner only seen in totalitarian states and countries. Police for instance are used as private armies of the oppressors at will going as far as firing potentially deadly rubber bullets into crowds of innocent families doing nothing more than to legally protest.
    Needless to say the fait a complis arrived: the JAB! We know it is not safe! TGA reports around 500 death and over 46000 serious side effects to date. The jab is not a vaxxine by definition in that it offers little immunity to covid if any. So why this bulling and coercion to take the jab? There is virtually no exception possible to avoid it anymore. The Federal Government does nothing to stop the states in this wrongful onslaught of, once thought illegal, practices? My final point. Is the judiciary really still functioning independently guided by the laws enshrined in our constitution? I mean the AMA and doctors have seemingly a banded the Hippocratic oath! Sorry it took longer than I anticipated! Also this is just written to stimulate one’s thoughts and not meant to be in any way controversial.

    1. It is amazing what “fear” does to people. Why haven’t more people done some
      research? It is all out there, you just need to spend a little time to find it. Now
      the doctors are not allowed to issue exemptions or give out a certificate for
      anything needing to get money from the government.

  13. Thanks Tony and Monica, my husband has been banging on for decades that Australia should have a Bill of Rights. I’m with Mack (National Education United), that we want to create something different for future Australia. The world has been bound by a small number of tyrants for too long. Awake. In the creation of something new, a Bill of Rights has to be on the list…..

  14. Is there no doctor willing to write an en-masse medical certificates? Even if the reasoning is “causing mental anguish to subject”, a medical certificate is an exemption.

  15. Just wondering why we haven’t (or if we will in the future) followed the example in Canada of asking the Health minister for proof of the isolated virus as proof that the directions are lawful..? That seemed to work for them? There may be a reason, but just a query?

    1. Freedom of Information Requests: Health/ Science Institutions Worldwide “Have No Record” of SARS-COV-2 Isolation/Purification
      By Fluoride Free Peel
      Global Research, August 04, 2021
      Global Research Note >
      We bring to the attention of our readers this carefully documented study.
      While the Chinese authorities announced on January 7, 2020 that they had isolated and identified “a new type of virus” no details were provided.
      Then on the 28th of January 2020, the US Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stated that the novela corona virus had been isolated.
      The central question raised in this study is the following: is there reliable evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated from an “unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient”?
      The study provides documentation based on Freedom of Information requests addressed to Health /Science institutions in a large number of countries.
      The responses to these requests confirm that there is no record of isolation/ purification undertaken by the numerous Health /Science institutions which were contacted.
      It is worth noting that according to the Berlin Virology Institute, the WHO in January 2020 did not have in its possession details regarding the isolation and identity of SARS-CoV-2.
      Moreover, because the relevant details concerning isolation /purification were not available, the WHO decided pursuant to the advice of the Berlin Virology Institute to “customize” The Real Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) using the “similar” 2003 SARS virus (subsequently renamed SARS-1) as “a point of reference” for detecting genetic fragments of the 2019 SARS-CoV-2.
      Bear in mind, this totally flawed RT-PCR test is being used not only to detect V-the virus, it is now being used to ‘detect” the variants of SARS-CoV-2.
      Supporting documents including the responses by Health /Science institutions, CDC, etc are provided in this study. Also more documents can be consulted by downloading the relevant pdf files compiled by the researchers.
      Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, August 4, 2021
      (The Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is “a viral respiratory disease caused by a SARS-associated coronavirus”, first identified in China in February 2003).
      Would a sane person mix a patient sample (containing various sources of genetic material and never proven to contain any particular virus) with transfected monkey kidney cells, fetal bovine serum and toxic drugs, then claim that the resulting concoction is “SARS-COV-2 isolate” and ship it off internationally for use in critical research (including vaccine and test development)?
      Because that’s the sort of fraudulent monkey business that’s being passed off as “virus isolation” by research teams around the world.
      Just 1 of many examples is shown below – this is from a study cited by the Australian Department of Health as a paper “which led to the isolation of SARS-CoV-2 in culture“. (Can you spot the oxymoron in that quote?)………
      If you are new to the topic of “virus isolation/purification”, I strongly recommend that you begin by reading the Statement On Virus Isolation by Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Thomas Cowan and Sally Fallon Morell, MA or watch this 5 minute video from Dr. Cowan…..
      Note that some institutions failed to fully co-operate. Tsk tsk University of Auckland, Public Health Wales, Imperial College London.
      And yes, we are aware of the many publications wherein authors claim to have “isolated the virus”.
      We’ve looked at numerous such studies and have yet to see one where they actually did so. Claiming to have done something and actually doing it are sometimes 2 different things, even in peer-reviewed science.
      And yes we are aware of the many published alleged “SARS-COV-2 genomes” – these were in fact manufactured, not discovered. And yes we are aware that EM photos have been published, allegedly of “the virus”, however a photo of something does not tell you what the thing is, where it came from or what it does. One has to scrutinize the Methods used to “isolate the virus” / obtain said photos / obtain alleged genomes, and that is when absolutely everything falls apart with “COVID-19”.
      FOI responses from institutions in the U.S., India, Republic of Africa, New Zealand, Australia, U.K., England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Spain, European CDC, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Ukraine, Columbia, Uruguay, Portugal, Brazil, Republic of Colombia, Ilse of Man, etc., plus emails from Germany’s Robert Koch Institut (RKI) and several “virus isolation authors”.
      A big Thank You to all the individuals who have now kindly shared additional responses that they obtained re isolation/purification/existence of “SARS-COV-2”. Some prefer to remain anonymous, others are named below.
      Also note that we have included below responses from the U.S. CDC and a couple of New Zealand institutions in regards to isolation/purification of a number of other alleged “viruses”, i.e. “HIV”, “measles virus”, “polio virus”, “HPV”, “Ebola virus”, “Zika virus”, “XMRV”, “HTLV1”, “HTLV-III/LAV”, 2003 “SARS-COV”, “MERS virus”, any common cold “coronavirus”, any “virus” on their “immunization” schedules. Again, none have yielded any records or citations of records describing the isolation/purification of any “virus” from a patient sample.
      As this next link you will see a “no records of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification” FOI response from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (CDC/ATSDR), dated November 2, 2020: see this as just one example of Health/ Science Institutions Worldwide “Have No Record” of SARS-COV-2 Isolation/Purification
      At this next link you will find an interesting “no records” FOI response from Australia’s Department of Health: …
      see this………… FROM AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH ‘The department does not hold the documents you are seeking access to (they spelled it too).
      To obtain the information you are seeking please direct your request to the various State and Territory Departments of Health.
      Kind Regards, FOI Officer
      Same admission from Australia’s Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/australias-doherty-institute-claimed-to-have-isolated-the-covid-19-virus-aka-sars-cov-2-later-said-they-have-no-record-of-such/ (which had publicly claimed to have “isolated the virus”).

      Same admission from Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation – CSIRO (“Australia’s national science research agency”), which is involved in “COVID-19” vaccine trials https://www.csiro.au/en/Research/Health/Infectious-diseases-coronavirus/Fighting-the-virus/Vaccine-testing using the so-called “SARS-COV-2 isolate” from Doherty Institute: see this.
      March 22, 2021, Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation still has no record of any “SARS-COV-2” purified from a patient, by anyone, anywhere: see this.
      goto the link hereunder to see it all >
      The next FOI letter shown in the screenshot below is in response to a request that was submitted on the advice of Australia’s Department of Health, and has come to us via John Blaid. Addressed to Mary-Jane Liddicoat, the formal but undated letter was authored sometime after March 9, 2021 by Dr. Nick Coatsworth, Executive Director of Medical Services, Canberra Health Services (CHS), ACT Government (Government of the Australian Capital Territory).
      [When reviewing Coatsworth’s response, bear in mind the following facts provided us by Darren Christison, a journalist in Sydney, Australia: “This is the same Dr Nick Coatsworth who is the ‘poster boy’ for the Australian government’s push to vaccinate everyone until they urinate the poison, and has been a permanent fixture on TV and online in recent months (see this). He’s also the same Dr Nick Coatsworth who recently, according to The Sydney Morning Herald, ‘admonished a “hardcore rump of activist doctors” spreading misinformation and undermining vaccine confidence” (see this).]
      Coatsworth admitted that Canberra Health Services holds no records relevant to the topic of isolating (aka purifying) the alleged “SARS-COV-2”. His entire letter is here.
      Very important for everyone to see this most important information.
      Please continue here >

      Freedom of Information Requests: Health/ Science Institutions Worldwide “Have No Record” of SARS-COV-2 Isolation/Purification
      By Fluoride Free Peel
      Global Research, August 04, 2021

      90 Health/Science Institutions Globally All Failed to Cite Even 1 Record of “SARS-COV-2” Purification, by Anyone, Anywhere, Ever
      By Fluoride Free Peel
      Global Research, August 04, 2021
      Fluoride Free Peel 6 June 2021
      The following article provides a summary of the authors’ more detailed article entitled
      Freedom of Information Requests: Health/ Science Institutions Worldwide “Have No Record” of SARS-COV-2 Isolation/Purification https://www.globalresearch.ca/foi-reveal-health-science-institutions-around-world-have-no-record-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification-anywhere-ever/5751969
      By Fluoride Free Peel, August 04, 2021
      This article provides links to correspondence (pdf) with several of the Health/Science institutions.
      For references purposes, below is the scan of the researchers “Freedom of Information” letter. The responses can be consulted. See links below as well as in the related article entitled:
      Freedom of Information Requests: Health/ Science Institutions Worldwide “Have No Record” of SARS-COV-2 Isolation/Purification
      Continue >

  16. I just cannot get my head around it! Can anyone enlighten me why denying a person the ability to work and provide for her/his family is not a blatant act of COERCION? I mean if NO JAB NO JOB thru mandating a medical procedure to be accepted without written consent by an individual is not COERCION by stealth and therefore MUST BE ILLEGAL I fail to understand the term!!! I truly fear that the judiciary along with the rest of the ELITE is in on this attempt to annihilate our population in some form or other!!
    Hoping to be mistaken!?

    1. You’re not wrong Fred, the courts, police etc. are all corporations and do as their masters tell them. We’ve been taken over by stealth since WW2.

    2. It does do your head in trying to figure any logic to it. Just watched Rukshan interviewing Catherine Cumming MP. No logic, just Hitler playing politics. Hold the line :-). We will win this! P.S….join UAP if you haven’t already. RDA and UAP will be formidable!

  17. Sooner or later the ‘law’ has to catch up with what is going on – these actions by global governments are nothing short of criminal acts – the reported covid vaccine deaths and injuries globally is utterly jaw dropping – a fact those surely in ‘law’ cannot continue to dismiss.
    Here is a report re: Europe >

    27,247 Deaths and 2,563,768 Injuries Following COVID Shots in European Database – Taiwan Records More Deaths from Vaccine than Virus
    By Brian Shilhavy
    Global Research, October 16, 2021
    Health Impact News
    The European Union database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, and they are now reporting 27,247 fatalities, and 2,563,768 injuries, following COVID-19 injections.
    This database maintained at EudraVigilance is only for countries in Europe which are part of the European Union (EU), which comprises 27 countries.
    The total number of countries in Europe is much higher, almost twice as many, numbering around 50. (There are some differences of opinion as to which countries are technically part of Europe.)
    So as high as these numbers are, they do NOT reflect all of Europe.
    !!!!! The actual number in Europe which are reported dead or injured following COVID-19 shots would be much higher than what we are reporting here.
    The EudraVigilance database reports that through September 25, 2021 there are 27,247 deaths and 2,563,768 injuries reported following injections of four experimental COVID-19 shots:
    From the total of injuries recorded, almost half of them (1,222,818) are serious injuries.
    “Seriousness provides information on the suspected undesirable effect; it can be classified as ‘serious’ if it corresponds to a medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalisation, results in another medically important condition, or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.”
    A Health Impact News subscriber in Europe ran the reports for each of the four COVID-19 shots we are including here. It is a lot of work to tabulate each reaction with injuries and fatalities, since there is no place on the EudraVigilance system we have found that tabulates all the results.
    Since we have started publishing this, others from Europe have also calculated the numbers and confirmed the totals.*
    Here is the summary data through October 9, 2021. Continue >

    COVID 19 VACCINE STATISTICS – deaths and injuries
    This page is run and updated by my colleague, who is pretty damn good at wheedling out the statistical information from the tightly-controlled regulatory authorities. All The Goss will continue to display the latest casualties in summary form as new updates become available. These are official statistics and those who produce them, MHRA, EMA and VAERS, concede that they are much higher, (10 to 100 times higher) than the figures they have released. In some of the tables on this page a more realistic picture is illustrated….
    Following the tables are links that readers may find useful… continue > https://johnplatinumgoss.com/covid-19-vaccination-statistics/

    Covid-19 Vaccines Lead to New Infections and Mortality: The Evidence is Overwhelming
    Country Case Studies. Mortality and Morbidity
    By Gérard Delépine
    Global Research, October 10, 2021

    Reports of Serious Injuries After COVID Vaccines Near 112,000, as Pfizer Asks FDA to Green Light Shots for Kids 5 to 11
    From The Defender – Children’s Health Defense
    VAERS data released Friday by the CDC included a total of 778,685 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 16,310 deaths and 111,921 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and Oct. 1, 2021.
    8 October, 2021
    The data come directly from reports submitted to VAERS, the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.
    Every Friday, VAERS makes public all vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date, usually about a week prior to the release date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.
    Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.
    Fully vaccinated patient sparks COVID outbreak among vaccinated population
    A paper published Sept. 30, in Eurosurveillance showed a fully vaccinated patient in a hospital setting rapidly spread COVID to fully vaccinated staff, patients and family members — despite a 96% vaccination rate and use of full personal protective equipment.
    Of the 42 cases diagnosed in the outbreak, 38 were fully vaccinated with two doses of Pfizer and BioNTech’s Comirnaty vaccine, one had received only one vaccination and three were unvaccinated.
    Of the infected, 23 were patients and 19 were staff members. The staff all recovered quickly. However, eight vaccinated patients became severely ill, six became critically ill and five of the critically ill died. The two unvaccinated patients had mild COVID cases.
    The authors said the study challenges the assumption high universal vaccination rates will lead to herd immunity and prevent COVID outbreaks, as 96.2% of the outbreak subjects were vaccinated, infection advanced rapidly and viral load was high.
    More >

  18. Bit late here, only just been able to access the video. Thank you Tony and Monica. There is never a doubt that we will hold the line. If we cave in now, we lose our kids futures. And our own! Tony is quite right about our Aussie spirit, we will fight. We have been under-estimated by Dan Hitler, he thinks he has the vaccinated on board, but he doesn’t. Too many of them had to what they were forced to do, and they won’t forget….

  19. SOUTH AFRICA – Documents filed with Constitutional Court of South Africa
    Legal Action against South African President, Parliament and Reserve Bank.
    The President heard claims made by Chinese Government about a virus in Wuhan and WHO declared a pandemic and South African President followed suit; he did not confirm the claims made by the Chinese Government or the claims made by the World Health Organisation as he should have done before he imposed a lockdown of the South African people.
    What the President should have done was to send scientists to China and ask the Chinese Government to provide a pure sample of the Sars Cov 2 virus separated and isolated from all other contaminants and substances…….
    Please continue watching video >

    Also see >
    90 Health/Science Institutions Globally All Failed to Cite Even 1 Record of “SARS-COV-2” Purification, by Anyone, Anywhere, Ever
    By Fluoride Free Peel
    Global Research, August 04, 2021
    Fluoride Free Peel 6 June 2021
    The following article provides a summary of the authors’ more detailed article entitled
    Freedom of Information Requests: Health/ Science Institutions Worldwide “Have No Record” of SARS-COV-2 Isolation/Purification https://www.globalresearch.ca/foi-reveal-health-science-institutions-around-world-have-no-record-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification-anywhere-ever/5751969
    By Fluoride Free Peel, August 04, 2021
    This article provides links to correspondence (pdf) with several of the Health/Science institutions.
    For references purposes, below is the scan of the researchers “Freedom of Information” letter. The responses can be consulted. See links below as well as in the related article entitled:
    Freedom of Information Requests: Health/ Science Institutions Worldwide “Have No Record” of SARS-COV-2 Isolation/Purification
    Continue >