Union boss reacts to COVID-19 vaccine mandate for construction sector

Union boss John Setka says a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for the construction sector is “unfortunate” but a reality of living in a pandemic.

The CFMMEU boss had previously voiced opposition to mandatory vaccination on 3AW, but the government revealed on Thursday being vaccinated would be a requirement to work on a site from the end of next week.

“Extreme circumstances sometimes call for extreme measures,” Mr Setka told Tom Elliott.

“It’s unfortunate, but it is what it is.”

Press here to hear him on 3AW

Latest News


This post is a copy of last night’s mass email. It explains the ‘RDA lives’ comment and other things 🙂 If you’re not subscribed to

Read More »


  1. Whats wrong with these people? This union used to be very powerful and reflect the voice of its members. He is now in the socialist/Globalist pocket now. No backbone, if I were a CFMEU member I WOULD CANCEL MY MEMBERSHIP. come Aussies, hit him in the pocket. He really does not represent the best interests of his members.

    1. John Setka is a pretty scary dude. I’m not going to pretend I’d ever do anything to him, even if I could – which I CAN’T (I do hope thats sufficiently clear for the ASIO officers reading this!?) BUT I’m thinking he’s going to find some other equally scary dudes who might not be so happy about taking the clot shot. Could get entertaining.

  2. You take the peoples money who pay you to protect them and then when you’re called to stand for them you throw them under the bus under the guise of a pandemic that you clearly have not researched or perhaps  turned a blind eye to whilst lining your greedy pockets with government influence. Either way, we the people see you John Setka. We will not forget!

    Watch Video >

    Parental Outrage as UK Approves COVID Shots for 12 to 15-Year-Olds Leaving Decision to Children NOT Parents
    Fury has erupted tonight after ministers confirmed plans to vaccinate all children over 12 across the UK from next week – with experts and parents warning it may lead to unvaccinated pupils being ‘bullied’ and could even ‘tear families apart’. Vaccines minister Nadhim Zahawi confirmed the plans to offer a single Pfizer jab to healthy 12 to 15-year-olds during a speech to the House of Commons tonight. But he reiterated that the final decision whether to have the jab would be down to children – and not their parents. Angry parents fumed against the move to leave the decision with young children who ‘can’t even decide what they want for tea, never mind’ a vaccine.

    Open Letter To ALL Doctors and ALL Australians
    A return to evidenced-based pandemic preparedness guidelines is now urgently sought.
    ‘Primum Non Nocere’ OR First Do No Harm
    Wednesday 11th August 2021
    Doctors, health professionals and millions of concerned Australians demand an immediate end to unprecedented, pervasive and coercive “States of Emergency” and the return to transparent and evidence-based pandemic preparedness and early-stage treatment.
    We, your fellow doctors, write to you motivated only by our concern for the welfare of our patients and the health of our community.

    Every doctor, like any individual, must answer to their own conscience. Doctors in particular must answer to an Oath, the swearing in of which has fallen away, yet not without leaving its spirit alive. This oath was, and is, founded upon ‘primum non nocere’ or ‘first do no harm’.

    This letter is aimed at reminding all doctors of our ethical obligations and to furnish our consciences with information so that none can claim ‘I did not know’ or ‘I was wrongly advised’ or ‘I was just following orders’.

    The people of Australia face unprecedented, pervasive and coercive ‘States of Emergency’ with severe restrictions to liberty and widespread impacts on health, life and livelihoods. ‘Flattening the curve’ for a few weeks has become eighteen months of fear, anxiety and control. Much of it unnecessarily contrived through sensationalist media, failed political leadership that has abdicated its responsibilities to academic and health bureaucrats who appear far removed from the realities and sufferings of ordinary Australians.

    Covid-19 Vaccination Statistics – Deaths & Injuries
    This page is run and updated by my colleague, Mairead, who is pretty damn good at wheedling out the statistical information from the tightly-controlled regulatory authorities. All The Goss will continue to display the latest casualties in summary form as new updates become available. These are official statistics and those who produce them, MHRA, EMA and FDA, concede that they are much higher, (10 to 100 times higher) than the figures they have released. In some of the tables on this page a more realistic picture is illustrated.

    Doctors for Truth: Tens of Thousands Medical Professionals Suing and Calling for End to COVID Tyranny
    18 October, 2020
    by Brian Shilhavy
    Editor, Health Impact News
    Tens of thousands, and perhaps now even hundreds of thousands of doctors, nurses, and many other medical professionals worldwide are taking action to combat the misinformation being propagated by governments and government-controlled media that continue to publish false propaganda regarding COVID.
    The vast majority of medical professionals worldwide now seem to agree that the COVID “pandemic” and the government actions still being implemented in response to COVID are causing much more harm than COVID itself.
    Almost all of these doctors and medical professionals now seem to agree that COVID is no worse than a typical flu season, and the main test being used to supposedly test for COVID, the PCR Test, is not reliable.
    The main question left, and indeed perhaps the question from which the answer may very well determine the future fate of our planet, is will enough people in the general public stop believing the lies their government and the corporate media continue to broadcast, using bureaucratic “doctors” who are only “doctors” in name and are instead politicians who hang letters before and after their names (Dr. – MD) to try and give them credibility, but never actually examine real patients nor practice medicine, and instead look elsewhere to find out the truth, particularly from the REAL doctors and medical professionals who have all now figured out that COVID is nothing worth shutting down society over and implementing a New World Order?
    These doctors and medical professionals are fighting censorship and ridicule from the ruling classes, the corporate media, and the Big Tech Social Media giants.
    COVID is, first and foremost, an INFORMATION WAR, and unless Americans can learn how to turn off their cable news programs with their BILLIONS in funding, mainly from Big Pharma, and take the time to research the issues for themselves, the Globalists will unleash their vaccines and other untested products while also causing social unrest in their effort to implement their New World Order.
    The Great Barrington Declaration
    Earlier this month (October, 2020), three of the world’s most renowned doctors, Dr. Martin Kulldorff, Harvard Medical School Professor, Dr. Sunetra Gupta, Oxford University Epidemiology Professor, and Dr. Jayanta Bhattacharya, Stanford Epidemiology Professor, authored the Great Barrington Declaration.
    Since its publication, at the time of writing of this article, it has been signed by 29,202 Medical Practitioners, 10,576 Medical & Public Health Scientists, and 532,027 Concerned Citizens.
    Here is the Declaration:
    The Great Barrington Declaration – As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.
    Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.
    Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.
    Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.
    As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.

    The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection.
    Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent PCR testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals.
    Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.
    Doctors for Truth Sues the Netherlands
    More >

    COVID VACCINES – DIRE WARNINGS in this Paper by Seneff & Nigh – damage from these vaccines is potentially catastrophic and transgenerational – and now they have targets on our children.
    The rats will be scurrying from an exploding ship when the population learn the true facts of these shocking experimental covid vaccines – please read these papers – I note today, that already as at 16.9.2021 23,751,922 of these experimental jabs have been coerced/forced on Australians and being mandated for ever increasing population sectors – this grossly violating universal informed consent codes.
    Also Paper from Classen Immunotherapies.

    PLEASE READ THESE PAPERS AS OUR POLITICIANS are incapable of (allegedly) independent and unbiased research as their extreme pro-vaccination lobby involvement/stance proves and allegedly throughout the entire Australian Government Vaccinations Policy is rife with Conflicts of Interest -it’s shocking and they are answerable to no one. Likewise – who in the hell allowed mainstream media empires to be calling the shots and virtual mouthpieces for Pharmaceutical Industry (allegedly) – WRONG WRONG WRONG. They all have to be stopped. Read the Papers – the DIRE WARNINGS.


    Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible
    Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines
    Against COVID-19
    Stephanie Seneff and Greg Nigh
    Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge MA, 02139, USA, E-mail:
    Naturopathic Oncology, Immersion Health, Portland, OR 97214, USA
    Operation Warp Speed brought to market in the United States two mRNA vaccines, produced by Pfizer and
    Moderna. Interim data suggested high efficacy for both of these vaccines, which helped legitimize Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA. However, the exceptionally rapid movement of these vaccines through controlled trials and into mass deployment raises multiple safety concerns. In this review we first describe the technology underlying these vaccines in detail. We then review both components of and the intended biological response to these vaccines, including production of the spike protein itself, and their potential relationship to a wide range of both acute and long-term induced pathologies, such as blood disorders, neurodegenerative diseases and autoimmune diseases. Among these potential induced pathologies, we discuss the relevance of prion-protein-related amino acid sequences within the spike protein. We also present a brief review of studies supporting the potential for spike protein “shedding”, transmission of the protein from a vaccinated to an unvaccinated person, resulting in symptoms induced in the latter. We finish by addressing a common point of debate, namely, whether or not these vaccines could modify the DNA of those receiving the vaccination. While there are no studies demonstrating definitively that this is happening, we provide a plausible scenario, supported by previously established pathways for transformation and transport of genetic material, whereby injected mRNA could ultimately be incorporated into germ cell DNA for transgenerational transmission. We conclude with our recommendations regarding surveillance that will help to clarify the long-term effects of these experimental drugs and allow us to better assess the true risk/benefit ratio of these novel technologies.
    Full Paper >

    COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease
    Classen Immunotherapies, Inc., 3637 Rockdale Road, Manchester
    MD 21102, E-mail: classen@vaccines.net
    J. Bart Classen, MD*
    Development of new vaccine technology has been plagued with problems in the past. The current RNA based SARSCoV-2 vaccines were approved in the US using an emergency order without extensive long term safety testing. In this paper the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated for the potential to induce prion-based disease in vaccine recipients. The RNA sequence of the vaccine as well as the spike protein target interaction were analyzed for the potential to convert intracellular RNA binding proteins TAR DNA binding protein (TDP-43) and Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) into their pathologic prion conformations. The results indicate that the vaccine RNA has specific sequences that may induce TDP-43 and FUS to fold into their pathologic prion confirmations. In the current analysis a total of sixteen UG tandem repeats (ΨGΨG) were identified and additional UG (ΨG) rich sequences were identified. Two GGΨA sequences were found. Potential G Quadruplex sequences are possibly present but a more sophisticated computer program is needed to verify these. Furthermore, the spike protein, created by the translation of the vaccine RNA, binds angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a zinc containing enzyme. This interaction has the potential to increase intracellular zinc. Zinc ions have been shown to cause the transformation of TDP-43 to its pathologic prion configuration.
    The folding of TDP-43 and FUS into their pathologic prion confirmations is known to cause ALS, front temporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological degenerative diseases.
    The enclosed finding as well as additional potential risks leads the author to believe that regulatory approval of the RNA based vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 was premature and that the vaccine may cause much more harm than benefit.
    Full Paper >

  4. Let us hope that all members of these unions can unite and do a vote of no confidence ?
    He is allegedly, negligently, recklessly and foolishly ‘going with the flow’ and ignoring the voices of reason and any and all opposing information/views – I believe he has put himself in a very bad position – I hope they vote him out urgently.
    I think all hell globally is going to break loose on this APPALLING HUMAN RIGHTS AND HEALTH RIGHTS MOST ABHORRENT VIOLATIONS BY GOVERNMENTS.

    AS OUR POLITICIANS are incapable of (allegedly) independent and unbiased research as their extreme pro-vaccination lobby involvement/stance proves and allegedly throughout the entire Australian Government Vaccinations Policy is rife with Conflicts of Interest – it’s shocking and they are answerable to no one.
    Likewise with the alleged conflicts of interests therein > who in the hell allowed mainstream media empires to be calling the shots and virtual mouthpieces for Pharmaceutical Industry (allegedly) – WRONG WRONG WRONG. They all have to be stopped.
    We’ve had a gut full of mainstream media who allegedly have massive conflicts of interest – why is there no independent body to rip them down.

    Most politicians and their interests/agendas (allegedly) (thank God for the ones fighting for truth and fighting for populations’ democratic/medical rights and freedoms) – the former drunk on power/control and money, influence and mainstream medicine and their interests’ (particularly big pharmaceutical/vaccine industries/mainstream media) have all allegedly, recklessly, negligently and wilfully, abandoned all due dilligence, duty of care, precautionary principle, truth, respect, ethics, integrity and honour and the first do no harm rule and they have allegedly committed a most foul breach/violation of Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights and The Nuremberg Code and those people in Governments submitting the people to tyrannical control must be voted out and those Honorable Politicians fighting for our democratic/medical freedoms, rights and all right and freedoms must be supported and voted in by the people.

    1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
    This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.
    Also see >
    For more information see Nuremberg Doctor’s Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75. http://bmj.com/content/vol313/issue7070/#NUREMBERG

    Do Mandatory Masks and Vaccines Break the 10 Points of the Nuremburg Code?
    by Makia Freeman / February 11th, 2021
    Society is regressing right now. We are giving up hard-fought rights and freedoms out of fear. Collectively, we are forgetting that we have already long ago established fundamental human rights such as bodily autonomy, medical sovereignty and informed, voluntary consent.
    The Nuremburg Code is a stark reminder that we have been through all this before, and got through it to crystallize the lessons learned. We must remember Who We Are and stop this insane COVID medical experimentation – before it’s too late.
    Full article >

    Australian Parliament : Introduction of Bill. Dedicated to the truck drivers of the nation
    30 August, 2021
    Introduction of Bill : No Requirement for Medical Treatment (Including Vaccination) Without Consent (Implementing Article 6 of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights) Bill 2021
    This Bill is dedicated to the truck drivers of the nation who have had their freedoms stolen and are about to lose their jobs because they refuse to submit to a forced medical intervention
    Article6.1 of this Treaty to which Australia is a signatory; provides any preventative, diagnostic and therapeutic intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned based on adequate information………the consent should where appropriate be expressed and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time.
    CRAIG KELLY M.P. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vw7hKiY1_I

    Palmer exposes corrupt big pharma politics and blackmail in NSW
    SEP 15, 2-21
    Posted by Editor, cairnsnews
    CLIVE Palmer has exposed the corrupt role of big pharma companies Pfizer and AstraZeneca behind Gladys Berejiklian’s frantic push for vaccines in NSW.
    In a press conference on Tuesday Palmer dropped a bomb on the NSW Liberals and the corrupt role of a political lobbyist being paid tens of millions of dollars by Pfizer and Astra Zeneca. The same lobbyist, says Palmer, controls the Liberal Party in Sydney and is using the threat of the Independent Commission Against Corruption’s (ICAC) inquiries into Gladys Berejiklian to pull her strings and push the vaccines.
    Media and mainstream parties are in a panic, trying to cover up the mounting scandal by attacking Palmer, whose United Australia Party is about to become the biggest political party in Australia by membership.
    Palmer also accused the head of the TGA Prof. John Skerrit, as the chief regulator of drugs in Australia, of being in a “serious conflict of interest” by going on television in a white coat promoting vaccines threatening media owners with withdrawal of advertising if they published stories contrary to government vaccine policy.
    Palmer dropped the bomb when a jabbering journalist tried to push the NSW government’s lies about 1600 “cases” and that people really were dying from COVID-19 and the only way out for locked-down small businesses in NSW was for most of the population to get a double jab. “They can’t open their businesses because the premier’s telling them the only way out is a double jab and that’s what they’re being told,” said the journo.
    “I’d say the premier is lying to them,” Palmer shot back. “And I’d say that she’s under an ICAC inquiry, but a particular lobbyist in Sydney controls the Liberal Party in Sydney and told her the only way she gets out of that inquiry is if she pushes the double jab, and his clients are Astra Zeneca and his clients are Pfizer.”
    At that point the upstart journo butts in again, repeating the nonsense that the only way out for the business owners is the double jab.
    Palmer’s very newsworthy allegation of high-level corruption was too much for the lame-brained scribbler to take in, apparently.
    More >

    Challenging Big Pharma’s lucrative over-vaccination of people and animals
    About Elizabeth Hart
    The ethical aspects of over-vaccination, especially mandated vaccination, are of particular interest to me. The potential conflicts of interests of academics working in the areas of vaccine development and promotion, and the influence of these academics on government policy, needs to be examined.
    I am challenging the increasing number of questionable vaccines and repeat vaccinations being foisted upon children, adults and animals by the burgeoning and unfettered vaccine industry. There’s a ‘big picture’ on lucrative over-vaccination which needs to be examined.
    I have a degree majoring in politics and philosophy, and experience in scientific literature searching. This background has assisted me in researching and lobbying on over-vaccination.
    continue >
    Click on website link to view information links throughout article and extensive information here also > OVER-VACCINATION – A MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR MARKET https://over-vaccination.net/
    See my new website Over-vaccination Epidemic
    https://over-vaccinationepidemic.net/ for more recent information.
    CHALLENGING over vaccination and policy in Australia
    Letters challenging over-vaccination
    The Conversation – a marketing arm for the university and research sector?
    Conflicts of interest…and vax committees
    Vaccination committees provide advice to governments on vaccine products and ‘recommend’ the addition of new vaccine products to national vaccination schedules.
    These groups wield enormous power. The members of these groups are part of a process of that can result in mandating of medical interventions for healthy people. The decisions they make affect not only children and adults in their own countries, but can also impact internationally as the ripple effect of their decisions spreads to other countries.
    As the decisions of these vaccination committees also result in massive sales of vaccine products for vaccine manufacturers, it is vital that the process of adding vaccine products to national vaccination schedules is open and transparent, and that any potential ‘conflicts of interest’ are accessible for public perusal.
    For example, a register detailing the history of any relationships with the vaccine industry, e.g. directorships, consultancies, research grants, honorariums etc, plus any shareholdings in vaccine companies, must be publicly accessible. If a member indicates they have no potential conflicts of interest, this must be clearly recorded.
    At this time, publicly accessible information on potential conflicts of interest is severely lacking. This is a matter I am continuing to investigate, see for example my post: UPDATE: Conflicts of interest and ‘the science of immunisation’ >
    Here are some committees/groups who are influential on vaccination policy:
    Continue >
    Read all the extensive information on these websites as mentioned above >


    No Jab, No Pay/No Play – coercive coronavirus vaccination in Australia – PM Scott Morrison and the Murdoch Media
    Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 3:43 PM From Elizabeth Hart to Scott Morrison Prime Minister of Australia
    Dear Mr Morrison,
    Brief Extract > Is the coercive vaccination No Jab, No Pay Law for children, orchestrated by Murdoch tabloids and Australian politicians in 2015, now being adapted to coerce all Australians to submit to fast-tracked experimental coronavirus vaccination, e.g. No Jab, No Pay/No Play?
    Mr Morrison, there has been little or no scrutiny of the Murdoch tabloids’ manipulation of Australia’s taxpayer funded vaccination policy, which has resulted in a coercive vaccination No Jab, No Pay law, and an ever increasing vaccination schedule, steeped in conflicts of interest.
    In Australia we do not have an effective fourth estate shining a bright light in dark corners of government. Instead we have a corporate media apparently publishing in its own best interests, e.g. News Corp Australia.
    Subscribers who try to provide a counter view to the biased Murdoch media narrative via the comments section are often censored, as I know from personal experience.
    The taxpayer-funded ABC and SBS operate as government propaganda machines promoting vaccine products without question, and fail to provide critical analysis of taxpayer-funded vaccination policy. As a result, most Australians are poorly informed about the conflicts of interest surrounding the burgeoning taxpayer-funded vaccination schedule.
    This is just part of the murky story of conflicts of interest surrounding taxpayer-funded vaccination policy in Australia.
    There must be an investigation into how the conflicted Murdoch media/News Corp Australia has been allowed to be so influential on Australian taxpayer-funded vaccination policy, particularly now with all
    Australians being threatened with coercive coronavirus vaccination via No Jab, No Pay/No Play mechanisms.
    Elizabeth Hart
    Independent person investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy.
    Full article >

    Murdoch media group’s influence on vaccination policy in Australia / conflicts of interest
    Elizabeth Hart Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 2:17 PM
    To: nsw@theaustralian.com.au
    Cc: letters@theaustralian.com.au , media@newscorp.com , liz.deegan@news.com.au
    For the attention of Mr Paul Whittaker, Editor-in-Chief of The Australian
    Please forward the email below to Mr Rupert Murdoch, Mr Lachlan Murdoch and Mr Robert Thomson
    Open email to:
    Mr Rupert Murdoch, Executive Chairman
    Mr Lachlan Murdoch, Co-Chairman
    News Corp
    Mr Robert Thomson, Chief Executive, News Corp
    Ms Sarah Murdoch, Director of and Ambassador for the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute
    Mr Rupert Murdoch and Mr Lachlan Murdoch
    I believe your media group’s No Jab, No Play campaign has influenced taxpayer-funded vaccination policy in Australia, with then Prime Minister Tony Abbott obligingly adopting your campaign as policy, i.e. No Jab, No Pay, with cross-party support from Labor’s Bill Shorten and the Greens’ Richard Di Natale.
    Your National Political Editor, Samantha Maiden, gloated about the success of The Sunday Telegraph’s No Jab, No Play campaign (11 April 2015).
    The No Jab, No Pay law was enacted in January 2016, under Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, the intent of this law being to make parents compliant to the ever-increasing taxpayer-funded children’s vaccination schedule. Some state governments are now also adopting No Jab, No Play policies.
    It appears Australian politicians may have been influenced by the Murdoch media group, while ignoring citizens well-founded concerns about the burgeoning National Immunisation Program Schedule.
    I strongly believe the Murdoch family has a conflict of interest in this matter, i.e. the Murdoch family’s
    association with the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, which is involved in industry-funded vaccine research and development.
    The Murdoch Children’s Research Institute website notes that Rupert Murdoch’s mother Dame Elisabeth Murdoch was involved in the founding of this institute. The Murdoch Children’s Research Institute’s Corporate Partners webpage states that News Corp and Foxtel support this institute.
    I suggest the Murdoch family’s association with an institute involved in industry-funded vaccine research and development should be clearly disclosed as a conflict of interest on all articles regarding vaccination published by the Murdoch media group.
    Mr Rupert Murdoch and Mr Lachlan Murdoch, would you not agree that failing to disclose this conflict of interest contravenes News Corp’s own Editorial Code of Conduct and News Corp’s Standards of Business Conduct in regards to conflict of interest?[1]
    For years your media group has run the extraordinarily biased No Jab, No Play vaccination campaign, and has been a major party in creating a polarised ‘pro’ and ‘anti’ vaccination climate, with hyperbolic articles such as ‘Anti-vaxers, you are baby killers’ (Claire Harvey, The Sunday Telegraph, 21 March 2015).
    In this hostile climate, any citizen questioning vaccination policy is reflexively labelled an ‘anti-vaxxer’ and
    marginalised or even censored.
    Politicians are refusing to respond to citizens’ concerns about taxpayer funded vaccine products, the cost of which is kept secret from taxpayers, i.e. categorised as ‘commercial-inconfidence’, protecting vaccine manufacturers from scrutiny.
    Your newspapers have failed to provide serious, objective and nuanced critical analysis of taxpayer-funded
    vaccination policy, i.e. examination of the burgeoning National Immunisation Program Schedule, which
    currently sits at around 50 doses of vaccines for children, via single and combination shots, and
    re vaccinations.[2] This does not include the annual flu vaccinations we are all being pressured to have,
    young and old. We have no idea of the long-term consequences of this increasing vaccine load.
    I suggest children are being grossly over-vaccinated with this plethora of vaccine products, which are added to the schedule without any consultation with the community.
    The community is being coerced with inducements and made compliant to the ever-increasing schedule, with the right to ‘informed consent’ before each vaccine intervention being effectively denied, in contravention of The Australian Immunisation Handbook’s definition of valid consent, i.e that “It must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation”. I suggest doctors, nurses and midwives are conflicted in their ethical duty with this coercive medical intervention.
    Since the No Jab, No Pay law was enacted in January 2016, yet another injection of diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis vaccines (GlaxoSmithKline Infanrix or Sanofi-Aventis Tripacel) has been added to the schedule, along with the recent addition of the meningococcal ACWY vaccines (Pfizer Nimenrix).
    Intensive industry lobbying for GlaxoSmithKline’s Bexsero meningococcal B vaccine continues, along with increasing pressure for annual flu vaccines for children, e.g. the NSW Government offering ‘free’ flu vaccines for children under five years. The bloated and conflicted vaccination schedule is out of control, we have no idea of the long-term cumulative consequences of all these vaccine interventions.
    Please continue >

    Coercive covid-19 injections in Australia – email to Nicola Spurrier – Chief Public Health Officer, SA Health et al. from Elizabeth Hart
    Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 2:38 PM
    Are people being given the opportunity to give their ‘informed consent’ before this medical
    intervention, considering the risks of SARS-CoV-2/covid-19 for their age group and health status? This must
    be considered in light of the criteria for valid consent in The Australian Immunisation Handbook, e.g. valid consent “can only be given after the potential risks and benefits of the relevant vaccine, the risks of not having it, and any alternative options have been explained to the person”; and, to be valid, consent “must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion or manipulation”.
    Professor Spurrier, I raised the matter of informed consent with the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation
    Agency (AHPRA) in September 2017, in regards to the No Jab, No Pay law.
    Martin Fletcher, the CEO of AHPRA responded to me in October 2017, saying:
    Good medical practice: A code of conduct for doctors in Australia provides guidance to medical practitioners.
    Informed consent is a key element of good medical practice.
    A medical practitioner must obtain informed consent before undertaking an examination or providing treatment, including providing vaccines.
    The immunisation legislation does not mandate vaccinations and consent is still required.
    The legislation explicitly provides for patients who cannot be immunised because of a medical contraindication.
    There is a process for reporting and managing adverse events following immunisation, with mandatory
    reporting requiring doctors to report certain events to their local health authority in most states and territories.
    (My emphasis.)
    Professor Spurrier, people aged 16-49 living in SA regional areas are being urged to have the covid-19
    injections – are these people being given the opportunity to give their ‘informed consent’ before this medical
    Similarly, many frontline workers, including healthcare professionals and aged care workers, are being pressured to have the covid-19 injections, with Prime Minister Scott Morrison lobbying “state and territory leaders to overrule medical experts’ advice and force aged care workers to get the coronavirus vaccine”, as reported by the ABC today: Scott Morrison to use National Cabinet to lobby state governments to go against health advice on COVID vaccinations. (See copy attached.)
    This is extremely serious Professor Spurrier.
    Mr Morrison appears to be making it a personal campaign to mandate covid-19 injections for aged care
    workers. But many of these aged care workers may be of an age and health status where they are not at serious risk of covid-19, because they may be able to mount their own effective immune response against SARS-CoV-2. If they are coerced into having covid-19 injections, this may damage their own natural ability to respond to SARSCoV-2 and other coronaviruses in future, with the intention of hooking them on covid injections for life. This is seriously unethical Professor Spurrier…
    Professor Spurrier, I have no confidence in Prime Minister Scott Morrison, he is deeply conflicted in this
    Continue >

  5. Let us hope that all members of these unions can unite and do a vote of no confidence ?
    He is allegedly, negligently, recklessly and foolishly ‘going with the flow’ and ignoring the voices of reason and any and all opposing information/views – I believe he has put himself in a very bad position – I hope they vote him out urgently.
    I think all hell globally is going to break loose on this APPALLING HUMAN RIGHTS AND HEALTH RIGHTS MOST ABHORRENT VIOLATIONS BY GOVERNMENTS.

    AS OUR POLITICIANS are incapable of (allegedly) independent and unbiased research as their extreme pro-vaccination lobby involvement/stance proves and allegedly throughout the entire Australian Government Vaccinations Policy is rife with Conflicts of Interest – it’s shocking and they are answerable to no one.
    Likewise with the alleged conflicts of interests therein > who in the hell allowed mainstream media empires to be calling the shots and virtual mouthpieces for Pharmaceutical Industry (allegedly) – WRONG WRONG WRONG. They all have to be stopped.
    We’ve had a gut full of mainstream media who allegedly have massive conflicts of interest – why is there no independent body to rip them down.

    Most politicians and their interests/agendas (allegedly) (thank God for the ones fighting for truth and fighting for populations’ democratic/medical rights and freedoms) – the former drunk on power/control and money, influence and mainstream medicine and their interests’ (particularly big pharmaceutical/vaccine industries/mainstream media) have all allegedly, recklessly, negligently and wilfully, abandoned all due dilligence, duty of care, precautionary principle, truth, respect, ethics, integrity and honour and the first do no harm rule and they have allegedly committed a most foul breach/violation of Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights and The Nuremberg Code and those people in Governments submitting the people to tyrannical control must be voted out and those Honorable Politicians fighting for our democratic/medical freedoms, rights and all right and freedoms must be supported and voted in by the people.

  6. What a bloody Traitor to his constituants this guy is. Takes their money and runs like a scared rabbit. Time everyone resigned from the traitorous unions. I did three years ago as I could see right through them.

  7. Vaccination and the Media – Conflicts of Interest in Australia
    39 June, 2020
    Around the world there’s a constant barrage of articles in the mainstream corporate media berating ‘anti-vaxxers’ and hindering citizens asking legitimate questions about vaccination policy.

    In Australia recently The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age have published a series of articles with an ‘anti-vaxxer’ theme – what is the motive behind the labelling and marginalisation of people who ask questions about vaccination? This is especially important to consider now as research on questionable coronavirus vaccines is being fast-tracked around the world.
    Conflicts of interest are clouding this issue.
    For an Australian perspective, see below independent vaccination campaigner Elizabeth Hart’s challenge to former politician Peter Costello.
    Costello is now Chairman of an Australian Government Investment Fund which includes over a billion dollars’ worth of vaccine company shares, while he also chairs a media company which publishes articles demeaning and marginalising people who question the ever-increasing number of lucrative vaccine products being added to the vaccination schedule.
    There’s a murky story to uncover about relationships between the media and vaccine industry…and connections with government.
    We the people have to work on exposing this scandal ourselves…
    16 June 2020
    For the attention of:
    Mr Peter Costello
    Chairman of the Board of Guardians of the Future Fund
    Non-Executive Chairman of Nine Entertainment Co
    Dear Mr Costello,
    It appears you have alarming conflicts of interest in your roles as Independent Non-Executive Chairman of Nine Entertainment Co, and Chairman of the Board of Guardians of the Future Fund.

    Nine Entertainment Co’s media promotes biased articles on vaccination, which ignore citizens’ valid concerns about vaccination policy and the burgeoning number of vaccine products being added to schedules without consultation, while the Future Fund has over a billion dollars invested in companies which inter alia manufacture lucrative vaccine products, i.e. CSL, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, and Merck.

    Consider below recent articles published in The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and other publications, which are generally couched as attacks on ‘anti-vaxxers’, and fail to provide critical analysis of complicated matters relevant to taxpayer-funded vaccination policy, i.e.

    ‘Dangerous’: Researchers note ‘massive uptick’ in anti-vaccination activity. Wendy Tuohy, 14 June 2020
    Government must counter misinformation on vaccinations. The Herald’s View, 14 June 2020
    Experts warn of new strains of misinformation as COVID-19 seeds conspiracy theories. Tim Biggs, 8 June 2020
    ‘Slap them down’ or hear them out: How to handle misinformation ‘superspreaders’? Wendy Tuohy, 31 May 2020
    ‘Act now’: AMA urges health education to combat ‘growing’ anti-vaxxer movement. Max Koslowski, 25 May 2020
    Federal ministers flooded with unprecedented level of anti-vaccination mail. Max Koslowski, 24 May 2020
    Queensland bans NRL players who refuse flu jab on non-medical grounds. Laine Clark and Scott Bailey, 12 May 2020
    Flu-jab duo face potential pay freeze as NRL, Titans brace for courtroom showdown. Michael Chammas and Sarah Keoghan, 11 May 2020
    Anti-vaccination activists use coronavirus to push resistance to inoculation. Peter Jamison, 6 May 2020
    Vaccination-sceptic political party wins name change despite heavyweight objectors. Zach Hope, 2 May 2020
    ‘Anti-vaxxers stay home’: Health Minister issues warning, announces new flu vaccine program for all primary school children. Lauren Pilat, 27 April 2020
    ‘Absolutely insane’: Anti-vaxxers promote coronavirus conspiracies. Caitlin Fitzsimmons and Tom Rabe, 20 April 2020
    Meanwhile, CSL/Seqirus receives product promotion and endorsement courtesy of The Sydney Morning Herald, i.e.

    ‘There will be enough’: CSL to hit record flu vaccine production. (Emma Koehn, 19 April 2020.)
    Did CSL/Seqirus pay for this flu vaccine product promotion in The Sydney Morning Herald?

    Mr Costello, the Future Fund has invested over a billion dollars in companies which inter alia manufacture vaccine products – it appears you have a conflict of interest in also being Chairman of a corporate media group which discredits and marginalises citizens who question taxpayer-funded vaccination policy, reflexively labelling them as ‘anti-vaccination’. CSL shares valued at $674 million, plus Pfizer shares worth more than $265 million, $251 million of Johnson and Johnson shares, and over $134 million of shares in Merck were equity holdings of the Future Fund Board of Guardians as of 30 June 2019.

    $310 million worth of Facebook shares are also listed in the Future Fund portfolio, and it is notable that Facebook is now hindering citizens’ free discussion of matters relevant to vaccine products and policy with its self-appointed ‘fact-checkers’.

    Mr Costello, many groups around the world are now working on fast-tracking coronavirus vaccine products, being led by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and with taxpayer-funding from many governments, including at least $352 million from the Australian government.
    Please note more discerning citizens will be demanding transparency and accountability for the lucrative vaccine products being pressed upon the global community.
    Corporate media groups such as Nine Entertainment Co will also be held accountable for biased reporting which provides unquestioning promotion for vaccine products.

    In Australia, News Corp also promotes biased coverage of vaccination matters, without disclosing its own conflict of interest in being a corporate partner of the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, an organisation which is involved in vaccine product research and development.
    Rupert Murdoch’s mother Dame Elisabeth Murdoch was involved in the establishment of the original Murdoch Institute, and today Sarah Murdoch is a member of the Board and the Ambassador for the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute.
    News Corp tabloids were behind the No Jab, No Play media campaign, which was obligingly adopted as policy by politicians across the political spectrum in Australia, and enacted as the coercive No Jab, No Pay law under Malcolm Turnbull as Prime Minister in January 2016. Members of the coercive vaccination lobby groups SAVN and Friends of Science in Medicine, e.g. John Cunningham and David Hawkes, were influential at the Senate Committee hearing re the No Jab, No Pay Bill in November 2015, which was attended by SAVN supporter Senator Richard Di Natale.

    Mr Costello, biased corporate media groups in Australia have failed to provide critical analysis of taxpayer-funded vaccination policy, an area which is awash with conflicts of interest, a situation that has been allowed to fester under both Liberal/Coalition and Labor governments, including during your tenure as a Liberal Member of Parliament. Likewise the taxpayer-funded ABC and SBS have failed to provide critical analysis of vaccination policy, simply acting as unquestioning promoters of vaccine products via their news articles and broadcasts.

    I have recently written to Prime Minister Scott Morrison requesting transparency for the various committees and organisations influencing vaccination policy, e.g. the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation; the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee; the National Centre for Immunisation Research & Surveillance; the TGA’s Advisory Committee on Vaccines; the TGA’s Australian Influenza Vaccine Committee; the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute; the Telethon Kids Institute; the Working Group and Oversight Committee for the Australian Academy of Science publication The Science of Immunisation: Questions and Answers; and any other group or organisation influential on Australian vaccination policy.

    It’s also notable that members of the industry-funded Immunisation Coalition are very influential in the media and on policy, but seldom disclose that this organisation is funded by vaccine manufacturers Seqirus/CSL, Pfizer, Merck (MSD), GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi. The Immunisation Coalition is also associated with the Australian Medical Association, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and other medical organisations, and is also sponsored by Google and others. Dr Tony Bartone, the current President of the Australian Medical Association, is an Immunisation Coalition member, a fact which is seldom disclosed in media articles. Other members of the Immunisation Coalition who are frequently provided with a soapbox in the media include Professor Robert Booy, Associate Professor Margie Danchin, Dr Katie Attwell and current Chair Dr Rod Pearce, but they seldom disclose they are associated with a vaccine industry-funded organisation.

    I have repeatedly brought many matters of concern about vaccination policy to the attention of journalists in Australia, including at The Sydney Morning Herald, and the taxpayer-funded ABC, but there appears to be a determination to ignore conflicts of interest in vaccination policy, and emerging problems with vaccine products.

    Mr Costello, please be aware of your conflicts of interest via the Future Fund, and in your position as Chairman of Nine Entertainment Co, and ensure that its media interests fulfil the ideal of the fourth estate and provide balanced and considered analysis of matters relevant to national and international vaccination policy.

    I request your response on this matter.

    Elizabeth Hart
    Independent citizen investigating conflicts of interest in vaccination policy and the over-use of vaccine products

    Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.

    Republishing Guidelines
    Source >

  8. I actually think Mr Sekta should be sacked. Forcing people to get the jab for what reason?? Because the government told him so. He is should be there for his members but he is there to do the government’s bidding!!! How come it is NOT mandatory for all government workers and bureaucrats and premiers etc etc to have the jab?????

Thank you for supporting us!

Thank you for supporting the work that RDA does. You can support our work further by volunteering with us.