After reluctantly taking a COVID-19 test as part of her employment, a worker from Bendigo Health sought out her results, only to find a raft of other items were tested for over and above COVID-19 that she did not consent to.
While the consent for the PCR test is for COVID-19 alone, this employee was also tested, without her knowledge, for other respiratory viral and bacterial infections including:
- Influenza A virus RNA
- Influenza B virus RNA
- Respiratory syncytial virus RNA
- Parainfluenza virus type 1/3 RNA
- Parainfluenza virus type 2 RNA
- Human Metapneumovirus RNA
- Human Adenovirus DNA
- Human Enterovirus DNA
- Human Rhinovirus RNA
- B. pertussis / B. parapertussis DNA
- Mycoplasma pneumoniae DNA
Upon further investigation, this is not isolated to Bendigo Health. Evidence from another source who shared their results, from a completely different location, was also tested for this full panel without their knowledge. An additional confirmation has also come from the Infection Control unit responsible for the employee’s test, disclosing in a phone call when asked that “…if anyone is symptomatic, the full panel is run.”
View the below test results paper as proof of what is really going on. Are the results of these contributing to the COVID-19 result status – so if you’re found positive it could be any number of other items? And are they obtaining this medical information WITHOUT ANYONE’S CONSENT?
The Coronavirus Victorian Government website clearly states that “The only thing you will be tested for is COVID-19 1“, which is a blatant lie if this is what is really happening.
Everyone, anyone, who has been tested – all the fence-sitters and deniers out there – request your results and check! If the Government, the Department of Health, the media, or your employer are all saying you are only tested for COVID-19 but you discover they have undertaken other tests as well – then you have to ask yourself – what else are they doing? Are the COVID positive numbers accurate? What else have they lied about? What else are they doing WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT?
Be vigilant and delve deeper to seek the truth!
Test Results Papers (personal information removed).
Coronavirus Website
Links
Responses
As the PCR is not an actual test, how can it possibly find all of the other bugs listed??
I am think it is a fabrication that they say they can find can find any of those via PCR .
And why would they??
That list of viruses/pathogens doesn’t include Sars CoV 2. Is there any indication that she was actually tested for it? Is there missing information? It begs the question, if she had tested positive for any of those other viruses, would she be declared positive for Covid? I wonder if Karla could chase up some more information about this. It’s a great find. Thank you
The point is any of the above lists can trip the test
Remember it can find anything
They would need to do other things on the sample to get down to whatever it was
Did not see delta variant in there anywhere 🙂
COVID VACCINES – DIRE WARNINGS in this Paper by Seneff & Nigh – damage from these vaccines is potentially catastrophic and transgenerational – and now they have targets on our children.
The rats will be scurrying from an exploding ship when the population learn the true facts of these shocking experimental covid vaccines – please read these papers – I note today, that already as at 16.9.2021 23,751,922 of these experimental jabs have been coerced/forced on Australians and being mandated for ever increasing population sectors – this grossly violating universal informed consent codes.
Also Paper from Classen Immunotherapies.
PLEASE READ THESE PAPERS AS OUR POLITICIANS are incapable of (allegedly) independent and unbiased research as their extreme pro-vaccination lobby involvement/stance proves and allegedly throughout the entire Australian Government Vaccinations Policy is rife with Conflicts of Interest -it’s shocking and they are answerable to no one. Likewise – who in the hell allowed mainstream media empires to be calling the shots and virtual mouthpieces for Pharmaceutical Industry (allegedly) – WRONG WRONG WRONG. They all have to be stopped. Read the Papers – the DIRE WARNINGS.
READ READ READ PLEASE EVERYONE AND SPREAD EVERYWHERE >
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VACCINE THEORY, PRACTICE AND RESEARCH IJVTPR
Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible
Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines
Against COVID-19
Stephanie Seneff and Greg Nigh
Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge MA, 02139, USA, E-mail:
seneff@csail.mit.edu
Naturopathic Oncology, Immersion Health, Portland, OR 97214, USA
Operation Warp Speed brought to market in the United States two mRNA vaccines, produced by Pfizer and
Moderna. Interim data suggested high efficacy for both of these vaccines, which helped legitimize Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA. However, the exceptionally rapid movement of these vaccines through controlled trials and into mass deployment raises multiple safety concerns. In this review we first describe the technology underlying these vaccines in detail. We then review both components of and the intended biological response to these vaccines, including production of the spike protein itself, and their potential relationship to a wide range of both acute and long-term induced pathologies, such as blood disorders, neurodegenerative diseases and autoimmune diseases. Among these potential induced pathologies, we discuss the relevance of prion-protein-related amino acid sequences within the spike protein. We also present a brief review of studies supporting the potential for spike protein “shedding”, transmission of the protein from a vaccinated to an unvaccinated person, resulting in symptoms induced in the latter. We finish by addressing a common point of debate, namely, whether or not these vaccines could modify the DNA of those receiving the vaccination. While there are no studies demonstrating definitively that this is happening, we provide a plausible scenario, supported by previously established pathways for transformation and transport of genetic material, whereby injected mRNA could ultimately be incorporated into germ cell DNA for transgenerational transmission. We conclude with our recommendations regarding surveillance that will help to clarify the long-term effects of these experimental drugs and allow us to better assess the true risk/benefit ratio of these novel technologies.
Full Paper >
https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Boards/BOH/Meetings/2021/SENEFF~1.PDF
COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease
Classen Immunotherapies, Inc., 3637 Rockdale Road, Manchester
MD 21102, E-mail: classen@vaccines.net
J. Bart Classen, MD*
Development of new vaccine technology has been plagued with problems in the past. The current RNA based SARSCoV-2 vaccines were approved in the US using an emergency order without extensive long term safety testing. In this paper the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated for the potential to induce prion-based disease in vaccine recipients. The RNA sequence of the vaccine as well as the spike protein target interaction were analyzed for the potential to convert intracellular RNA binding proteins TAR DNA binding protein (TDP-43) and Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) into their pathologic prion conformations. The results indicate that the vaccine RNA has specific sequences that may induce TDP-43 and FUS to fold into their pathologic prion confirmations. In the current analysis a total of sixteen UG tandem repeats (ΨGΨG) were identified and additional UG (ΨG) rich sequences were identified. Two GGΨA sequences were found. Potential G Quadruplex sequences are possibly present but a more sophisticated computer program is needed to verify these. Furthermore, the spike protein, created by the translation of the vaccine RNA, binds angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a zinc containing enzyme. This interaction has the potential to increase intracellular zinc. Zinc ions have been shown to cause the transformation of TDP-43 to its pathologic prion configuration.
The folding of TDP-43 and FUS into their pathologic prion confirmations is known to cause ALS, front temporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological degenerative diseases.
The enclosed finding as well as additional potential risks leads the author to believe that regulatory approval of the RNA based vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 was premature and that the vaccine may cause much more harm than benefit.
Full Paper >
https://dundasvalley.files.wordpress.com/2021/03/covid19-rna-based-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-prion-disease-1503.pdf